Evaluating how clear the questions being investigated in randomised trials are: systematic review of estimands
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate how often the precise research question being addressed about an intervention (the estimand) is stated or can be determined from reported methods, and to identify what types of questions are being investigated in phase 2-4 randomised trials. Design: Systematic review of the clarity of research questions being investigated in randomised trials in 2020 in six leading general medical journals. Data source: PubMed search in February 2021. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Phase 2-4 randomised trials, with no restrictions on medical conditions or interventions. Cluster randomised, crossover, non-inferiority, and equivalence trials were excluded. Main outcome measures: Number of trials that stated the precise primary question being addressed about an intervention (ie, the primary estimand), or for which the primary estimand could be determined unambiguously from the reported methods using statistical knowledge. Strategies used to handle post-randomisation events that affect the interpretation or existence of patient outcomes, such as intervention discontinuations or uses of additional drug treatments (known as intercurrent events), and the corresponding types of questions being investigated. Results: 255 eligible randomised trials were identified. No trials clearly stated all the attributes of the estimand. In 117 (46%) of 255 trials, the primary estimand could be determined from the reported methods. Intercurrent events were reported in 242 (95%) of 255 trials; but the handling of these could only be determined in 125 (49%) of 255 trials. Most trials that provided this information considered the occurrence of intercurrent events as irrelevant in the calculation of the treatment effect and assessed the effect of the intervention regardless (96/125, 77%)—that is, they used a treatment policy strategy. Four (4%) of 99 trials with treatment non-adherence owing to adverse events estimated the treatment effect in a hypothetical setting (ie, the effect as if participants continued treatment despite adverse events), and 19 (79%) of 24 trials where some patients died estimated the treatment effect in a hypothetical setting (ie, the effect as if participants did not die). Conclusions: The precise research question being investigated in most trials is unclear, mainly because of a lack of clarity on the approach to handling intercurrent events. Clear reporting of estimands is necessary in trial reports so that all stakeholders, including clinicians, patients and policy makers, can make fully informed decisions about medical interventions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021238053.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerns have been raised that the precise research questions that randomised trials are intended to answer are often unclear.
“Concerns have been raised that the precise research questions that randomised trials are intended to answer are often unclear.168”
From SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025) · cites this paper as [168]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883 · see citing works
The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions
(1995) · ACP Journal Club · doi:10.7326/acpjc-1995-123-3-a12 · Cited by 2,931 · see citing works
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Liraglutide for Adolescents with Obesity
Kelly, A. S., Auerbach, P., Barrientos-Perez, M., Gies, I., Hale, P. M., Marcus, C., Mastrandrea, L. D., Prabhu, N., & Arslanian, S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1916038 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes
Doria, A., Gałecki, A. T., Spino, C., Pop‐Busui, R., Cherney, D. Z. I., Lingvay, I., Parsa, A., Rossing, P. R., Sigal, R. J., Afkarian, M., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1916624 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Trial of Dexamethasone for Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Hutchinson, P. J., Edlmann, E., Bulters, D. O., Zolnourian, A. H., Holton, P., Suttner, N. J., Agyemang, K., Thomson, S., Anderson, I., Al-Tamimi, Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2020473 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Once-Weekly Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin Treatment
Rosenstock, J., BAJAJ, H. S., Janež, A., Silver, R., Begtrup, K., Hansen, M. V., Jia, T., & Goldenberg, R. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2022474 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses
Porta, N., Bonet, C., & Cobo, E. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.013 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Dechartres, A., Trinquart, L., Atal, I., Moher, D., Dickersin, K., Boutron, I., Perrodeau, E., Altman, D. G., & Ravaud, P. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j2490 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Estimands in clinical trials – broadening the perspective
Akacha, M., Bretz, F., & Ruberg, S. J. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7033 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Is there another way to take account of noncompliance in randomized controlled trials?
Hewitt, C. E. (2006) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.051625 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Inhaled Molgramostim Therapy in Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis
Trapnell, B. C., Inoue, Y., Bonella, F., Morgan, C., Jouneau, S., Bendstrup, E. M., Campo, I., Papiris, S. A., Yamaguchi, E., Çetınkaya, E., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1913590 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Hagen, S., Elders, A., Stratton, S., Sergenson, N., Bugge, C., Dean, S. G., Hay-Smith, J. E., Kilonzo, M. M., Dimitrova, M., Abdel‐Fattah, M., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3719 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Dias, J. J., Brealey, S., Fairhurst, C. M., Amirfeyz, R., Bhowal, B., Blewitt, N., Brewster, M., Brown, D. J., Choudhary, S., Coapes, C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30931-4 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Estimating Intervention Effects of Prevention Programs: Accounting for Noncompliance
Stuart, E. A., Perry, D. F., Le, H., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0104-y · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Vinkers, C. H., Lamberink, H. J., Tijdink, J. K., Heus, P., Bouter, L. M., Glasziou, P., Moher, D., Damen, J. A., Hooft, L., & Otte, W. M. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001162 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Estimands and Their Role in Clinical Trials
Akacha, M., Bretz, F., Ohlssen, D. I., Rosenkranz, G., & Schmidli, H. (2017) · Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1080/19466315.2017.1302358 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Aroda, V. R., Saugstrup, T., Buse, J. B., Donsmark, M., Zacho, J., & Davies, M. J. (2019) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.13804 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Endpoints for randomized controlled clinical trials for COVID-19 treatments
Dodd, L. E., Follmann, D. A., Wang, J., König, F., Korn, L. L., Schoergenhofer, C., Proschan, M. A., Hunsberger, S., Bonnett, T., Makowski, M., et al. (2020) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774520939938 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Lawrance, R. M., Degtyarev, E., Griffiths, P., Trask, P. C., Lau, H., D’Alessio, D., Griebsch, I., Wallenstein, G., Cocks, K., & Rufibach, K. (2020) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-020-00218-5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Estimands in published protocols of randomised trials: urgent improvement needed
Kahan, B. C., Morris, T. P., White, I. R., Carpenter, J. R., & Cro, S. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05644-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly phase clinical trials extension to guidelines for the content of statistical analysis plans
Homer, V., Yap, C., Bond, S. J., Holmes, J., Stocken, D. D., Walker, K., Robinson, E. J., Wheeler, G., Brown, S., Hinsley, S., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-068177 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Wollenberg, A., Nakahara, T., Maari, C., Peris, K., Lio, P., Augustin, M., Silverberg, J. I., Rueda, M. J., DeLozier, A. M., Pierce, E. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.17278 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Latimer, N. R., Abrams, K. R., Amonkar, M. M., Stapelkamp, C., & Swann, R. S. (2015) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0429 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group
Phillips, A., Abellan‐Andres, J., Soren, A., Bretz, F., Fletcher, C., France, L., Garrett, A., Harris, R., Kjaer, M., Keene, O. N., et al. (2016) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.1745 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Cro, S., Cornelius, V. R., Pink, A., Wilson, R., Pushpa‐Rajah, A., Patel, P., Abdul‐Wahab, A., August, S., Azad, J., Becher, G., et al. (2021) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.20653 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationKahan, B. C., Morris, T. P., White, I. R., Tweed, C., Cro, S., Dahly, D. L., Pham, T. M., Esmail, H., Babiker, A. G., & Carpenter, J. R. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01737-0 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of Probiotic Use on Antibiotic Administration Among Care Home Residents
Butler, C., Lau, M., Gillespie, D., Owen-Jones, E., Lown, M. T., Wootton, M., Calder, P. C., Bayer, A. J., Moore, M. V., Little, P. S., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8556 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Mitroiu, M., Rengerink, K. O., Teerenstra, S., Pétavy, F., & Roes, K. C. B. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04546-1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Choice of estimand and analysis methods in diabetes trials with rescue medication
Holzhauer, B., Akacha, M., & Bermann, G. (2015) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.1705 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Why ITT analysis is not always the answer for estimating treatment effects in clinical trials
Keene, O. N., Wright, D. N. M., Phillips, A., & Wright, M. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106494 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Cro, S., Forbes, G., Johnson, N. A., & Kahan, B. C. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01590-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationICH E9(R1) Working Group, Fletcher, C., Tsuchiya, S., & Mehrotra, D. V. (2016) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479016666586 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Statistical Considerations of Food Allergy Prevention Studies
Bahnson, H. T., Toit, G. D., & Lack, G. (2017) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Kahan, B. C., Ahmad, T. A., Forbes, G., & Cro, S. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.015 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimands in practice: Bridging the gap between study objectives and statistical analysis
Phillips, A., & Clark, T. (2020) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.2056 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Król, A., Palmér, R., Rondeau, V., Rennard, S. I., Eriksson, U. G., & Jauhiainen, A. (2020) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-020-01419-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
Hopewell, S., Chan, A.-W., Collins, G. S., Hróbjartsson, A., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Tunn, R., Aggarwal, R., Berkwits, M., Berlin, J. A., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081124 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationThe estimands framework: a primer on the ICH E9(R1) addendum
Kahan, B. C., Hindley, J., Edwards, M., Cro, S., & Morris, T. P. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076316 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationSPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
Hróbjartsson, A., Boutron, I., Hopewell, S., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Collins, G. S., Tunn, R., Aggarwal, R., Berkwits, M., Berlin, J. A., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081660 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationReporting of Factorial Randomized Trials
Kahan, B. C., Hall, S. S., Beller, E., Birchenall, M., Chan, A., Elbourne, D. R., Little, P. S., Fletcher, J., Golub, R. M., Goulão, B., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19793 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing modified intention-to-treat as a principal stratum estimator for failure to initiate treatment
Kahan, B. C., White, I. R., Edwards, M., & Harhay, M. O. (2023) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745231160074 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationEliminating Ambiguous Treatment Effects Using Estimands
Kahan, B. C., Cro, S., Li, F., & Harhay, M. O. (2023) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwad036 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“However, reported treatment effects in these studies are often ambiguously defined, which can lead to misinterpretation of study results (1, 2).”
InfluentialSelf-citationEvaluation of randomized controlled trials: a primer and tutorial for mental health researchers
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P. J., Schuurmans, L., Kaiser, T., Buntrock, C., van Straten, A., & Ebert, D. D. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07596-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“They are still much less common in mental health research, but there are very good reasons to make them a routine step in each RCT evaluation [67, 68].”
BackgroundConsensus Statement for Protocols of Factorial Randomized Trials
Kahan, B. C., Hall, S. S., Beller, E., Birchenall, M., Elbourne, D. R., Juszczak, E., Little, P. S., Fletcher, J., Golub, R. M., Goulão, B., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46121 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationDemystifying estimands in cluster-randomised trials
Kahan, B. C., Blette, B. S., Harhay, M. O., Halpern, S. D., Jairath, V., Copas, A. J., & Li, F. (2024) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802241254197 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationCro, S., Kahan, B. C., Patel, A., Henley, A., Joanna, C., Hellyer, P., Kumar, M., Rahman, Y., & Goulão, B. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07469-9 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“An estimand is a precise description of what treatment effect a trial is aiming to address (for examples, see [3, 6]).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLundeen, M. A., Hurd, J. L., Hayes, M., Hayes, M. L., Facile, T. R., Furia, J. P., Maffulli, N., Alt, C., Alt, E., Schmitz, C., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46653-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E9 (R1) Addendum on the use of estimands in clinical trials (i.e., a precise description of the treatment effect to be estimated from a trial (the question) 24–26 ) a comprehensive estimand was constructed for the present study.”
BackgroundMethodKahan, B. C., Juszczak, E., Beller, E., Birchenall, M., Chan, A., Hall, S. S., Little, P. S., Fletcher, J., Golub, R. M., Goulão, B., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080785 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“33 68 69 73 73 In the CONSORT example above, the estimand shows that, regardless of how the trial is analysed, interest for each comparison lies in the effect that would have been observed had participants not been simultaneously randomised for the other factor.”
Self-citationCottone, F., Efficace, F., Cella, D. F., Aaronson, N. K., Giesinger, J. M., Bachet, J., Louvet, C., Charton, É., Collins, P. G. S., & Anota, A. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.009 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Morgan, K. E., White, I. R., Leyrat, C., Stanworth, S. J., & Kahan, B. C. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10348 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Estimand Framework and Causal Inference: Complementary Not Competing Paradigms
Drury, T., Bartlett, J. W., Wright, D., & Keene, O. N. (2025) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.70035 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Pham, T. M., Kahan, B. C., Lopes, A., Rashid, M., Hoskin, P., & White, I. R. (2025) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745251360645 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“8 In many cases, this was because patients who died were often excluded from the analysis, which does not correspond to targeting a clear estimand.”
InfluentialSelf-citationApplication of the Estimand Framework to Anesthesia Trials
Silva, A. P. D., Leslie, K., Braat, S., & Grobler, A. C. (2024) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000004966 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Janani, L., Phillips, R., Vogt, E. V., Liu, X., Waddington, C. S., & Cro, S. (2024) · Clinical & Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1093/cei/uxae104 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationTime to improve the clarity of clinical trial reports by including estimands
Cro, S. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.o2108 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationUddin, M. N., Bashir, N. Z., & Kahan, B. C. (2023) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745231211272 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“22,23 For instance, as seen from our study results, a beneficial common OR does not necessarily indicate a beneficial effect on the most important categories within the ordinal outcome.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLanius, V., Glocker, B., Christian, L., Bratton, D. J., Callegari, F., Wright, M., & Rajamäki, S. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08915-6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Despite calls to reflect the implementation of the estimand framework in these guidelines [7, 36], the recent updates do not mention estimands as a specific item but discuss their inclusion as part of the item specifying objectives.”
Heinrich, M., Zagorscak, P., Bohn, J., Knaevelsrud, C., & Schulze, L. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01936-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kahan, B. C., Bretz, F., Copas, A. J., Harhay, M. O., Collins, P. G. S., Bahti, M., Bi, D., Campbell, M., Courtright, K. R., Feeney, T., et al. (2026) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-089050 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationDesign and analysis of randomized clinical trials of embryo diagnostics: phase 3
Wilkinson, J., Goodman, L. R., Hill, M. J., Seli, E. U., & Forman, E. J. (2025) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.07.017 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Current developments of the estimand concept
Fierenz, A., & Zapf, A. (2024) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.2395 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“33,34 The estimand framework has meanwhile been introduced to a few guidelines.”
Applying the estimand framework to inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials
Noor, N. M., Estevinho, M. M., Solitano, V., Yuan, Y., Kahan, B. C., & Jairath, V. (2025) · The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(25)00004-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationDesai, J. D., Huyghe, É., Maffulli, G. D., Nussbaum-Krammer, C. I., Tittelmeier, J., & Schmitz, C. (2025) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaf004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“%) studies, an estimand strategy for handling intercurrent events 57–59 was developed.”
Cro, S., Vogt, E. V., Totton, N., Lee, E. C., Jo, C., Hellyer, P., Kumar, M., Rahman, Y., & Henley, A. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08941-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“For example, the effect of an intervention if all doses were received can be quite different from its effect when not all doses are received [2, 4, 6].”
Self-citationKahan, B. C., Bahti, M., Bi, D., Bretz, F., Collins, P. G. S., Copas, A. J., Harhay, M. O., Li, F., & Auriemma, C. L. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-09352-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“An estimand is a precise description of the treatment effect a trial sets out to quantify and can be used to enhance clarity around the trial objectives and ensure alignment between a trial’s methods and its objectives [1, 3–8].”
Self-citationPoupin, P., Caille, A., Gana, W., Fougère, B., & Giraudeau, B. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.016 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
All I want for Christmas…is a precisely defined research question
Cro, S., & Phillips, R. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08604-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationApplying the Principal Stratum Strategy in Equivalence Trials: A Case Study
Sepin, J., Debray, T. P. A., Wei, W., Ebbers, H. C., Fernández‐Mendívil, C., & Mitroiu, M. (2025) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.70008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Deng, Y., Han, S., & Zhou, X. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70091 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Indeed, the medical community is calling for a thorough and rigorous approach to following the ICH E9 (R1) in the context of time-to-event data [50, 51].”
We must let the research question drive study methods
Kahan, B. C., Morris, T. P., & Cro, S. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.q173 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of estimands in cluster randomised trials: a reviewPreprint
Bi, D., Copas, A. J., & Kahan, B. C. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.10.25329251 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat is the research question? Estimands explained
Groenwold, R. H. H., le Cessie, S., & Dekkers, O. M. (2025) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvaf048 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Are estimands being correctly used? A review of UK research protocols
Clark, T., Wicentowski, R., Cro, S., Sydes, M. R., & Kahan, B. C. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-025-08991-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Previous reviews of publications of randomised clinical trials and published protocols have found that few trials explicitly define the estimand [18, 19].”
Self-citationMetcalfe, R., Vuong, Q., Yan, Y., Gorst‐Rasmussen, A., Remiro‐Azócar, A., Morga, A., Keene, O. N., Dron, L., & Park, J. J. H. (2026) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1017/rsm.2026.10076 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“6,12 However, limited”
When similar live birth rates do not mean protocol equivalence in frozen embryo transfer
Tuan, D. A. (2026) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-026-03998-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Table 2 translates existing CONSORT, CONSORT Harms, and ICH E9(R1) estimand principles into a FETspe-cific application checklist [7, 9, 18].”
Wu, K., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Zhang, J., & Chen, W. L. (2024) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10212 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Five estimand attributes [1, 2] (population,”
Navigating analytical challenges in clinical trials using the multiverse approachPreprint
Crenshaw, A. O. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p6c5v · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 extension: setting standards for reporting cluster randomised crossover trials
McKenzie, J. E. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.r637 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lundeen, M. A., Hurd, J. L., Hayes, M., Hayes, M. L., Facile, T. R., Furia, J. P., Maffulli, N., Alt, C., Alt, E., Schmitz, C., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.12.14.22283447
Carpenter, J. R., Kenward, M. G., Bartlett, J. W., Morris, T. P., Quartagno, M., & Wood, A. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119756118.ref
Self-citationLeducq, S., Fong, W. C. G., Williams, H. C., Bradshaw, L. E., & Thomas, K. S. (2025) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf031
Causal clarity in statistical software
Korf, M. N., van Geloven, N., Krijthe, J. H., & Labrecque, J. A. (2025) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyaf136
“There are many available resources to help define an estimand (e.g. [17–20]), yet, even in the reporting of randomized trials, estimands remain for the most part poorly defined [21, 22].”
Cro, S., Kahan, B. C., Patel, A., Henley, A., Joanna, C., Hellyer, P., Kumar, M., Rahman, Y., & Goulão, B. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23632533
Self-citationEMA Guidelines and Their Relationship to the Estimand Framework
Wei, J., Bretz, F., Xiong, C., Huang, Z., Wei, X., Wang, A., Zhang, X., Dai, L., Akacha, M., & Ou, C. (2025) · Springer series in pharmaceutical statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02192-2_12
Investigating estimand considerations in adaptive trials: a systematic review
Piazza, F., Wallace, H., Phillips, R., Cro, S., & Zenasni, Z. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09490-0
“[7].”
InfluentialSelf-citationHindley, J., Hartley, C., Hellier, J. M., Sturgeon, K., Greenwood, S., Newsome, I., Barrett, K., Smith, D., Pham, T. M., Bi, D., et al. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09767-4
“Common examples of intercurrent events include not receiving the assigned treatment, stopping the assigned treatment early, or receiving a different treatment to the one intended [2, 5, 7].”
Self-citationTuấn, Đ. A. (2026) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1007/s43441-026-01060-5
- Authors
- Cro, S., Kahan, B. C., Rehal, S., Chis Ster, A., Carpenter, J. R., White, I. R., & Cornelius, V. R.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2022-08-23
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- e070146
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9396446
- OpenAlex
- W4292749537
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- estimands, randomised trials, intercurrent events, treatment discontinuation, treatment non-adherence, adverse events, trial reporting quality, primary outcome definition, general medical journals, treatment effect estimation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review