Cited by 363Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis.

Open access
Saunders, Catherine H, Sierpe, Ailyn, von Plessen, Christian, Kennedy, Alice M, Leviton, Laura C, Bernstein, Steven L, Goldwag, Jenaya, King, Joel R +7 more·2023·BMJ

Abstract

Qualitative research methods explore and provide deep contextual understanding of real world issues, including people’s beliefs, perspectives, and experiences. Whether through analysis of interviews, focus groups, structured observation, or multimedia data, qualitative methods offer unique insights in applied health services research that other approaches cannot deliver. However, many clinicians and researchers hesitate to use these methods, or might not use them effectively, which can leave relevant areas of inquiry inadequately explored. Thematic analysis is one of the most common and flexible methods to examine qualitative data collected in health services research. This article offers practical thematic analysis as a step-by-step approach to qualitative analysis for health services researchers, with a focus on accessibility for patients, care partners, clinicians, and others new to thematic analysis. Along with detailed instructions covering three steps of reading, coding, and theming, the article includes additional novel and practical guidance on how to draft effective codes, conduct a thematic analysis session, and develop meaningful themes. This approach aims to improve consistency and rigor in thematic analysis, while also making this method more accessible for multidisciplinary research teams.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2022-074256

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practical thematic analysis of open-ended survey questions was done by a qualitative analyst, with code categories refined by another qualitative researcher who reviewed all coded data.

    “Practical thematic analysis14 of open-ended survey questions was done by a qualitative analyst (M.C.M.), who first created code categories based on responses. These code categories were then refined by another qualitative researcher (C.D.S.), who reviewed all coded data, made minor adjustments, and created themes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]27. Yen RW, Schubbe D, Walling L, et al. Patient engagement in the What Matters Most trial: experiences and future implications for research. Poster presented at International Shared Decision Making conference, Quebec City, Canada. July 2019.
  2. [29]29. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications. 2022. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saunders, C. H., Sierpe, A., von Plessen, C., Kennedy, A. M., Leviton, L. C., Bernstein, S. L., Goldwag, J., King, J. R., Marx, C. M., Pogue, J. A., Saunders, R. K., Van Citters, A., Yen, R. W., Elwyn, G., & Leyenaar, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Highland Park, NJ, USA
  • Dartmouth Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
Corresponding author
Saunders, Catherine H
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-06-08
Volume
381
Pages
e074256
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379964780
Cited by
363
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 5
FWCI
268.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, health services research, coding, theming, code development, multidisciplinary research teams
MeSH terms
Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review