The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first line treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: RATIONALE-305 randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab added to chemotherapy as first line (primary) treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma compared with placebo plus chemotherapy. Design: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, phase 3 study. Setting: 146 medical centres across Asia, Europe, and North America, between 13 December 2018 and 28 February 2023. Participants: 1657 patients aged ≥18 years with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, who had not received systemic anticancer therapy for advanced disease. Interventions: Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive either tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every three weeks in combination with chemotherapy (investigator’s choice of oxaliplatin and capecitabine, or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) and stratified by region, PD-L1 expression, presence or absence of peritoneal metastases, and investigator’s choice of chemotherapy. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was overall survival, both in patients with a PD-L1 tumour area positivity (TAP) score of ≥5% and in all randomised patients. Safety was assessed in all those who received at least one dose of study treatment. Results: Of 1657 patients screened between 13 December 2018 and 9 February 2021, 660 were ineligible due to not meeting the eligibility criteria, withdrawal of consent, adverse events, or other reasons. Overall, 997 were randomly assigned to receive tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (n=501) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=496). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy showed statistically significant improvements in overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TAP score of ≥5% (median 17.2 months v 12.6 months; hazard ratio 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.94); P=0.006 (interim analysis)) and in all randomised patients (median 15.0 months v 12.9 months; hazard ratio 0.80 (0.70 to 0.92); P=0.001 (final analysis)). Grade 3 or worse treatment related adverse events were observed in 54% (268/498) of patients in the tislelizumab plus chemotherapy arm versus 50% (246/494) in the placebo plus chemotherapy arm. Conclusions: Tislelizumab added to chemotherapy as primary treatment for advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma provided superior overall survival with a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TAP score of ≥5%, and in all randomised patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03777657
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699
Janjigian, Y. Y., Shitara, K., Moehler, M., Garrido, M., Salman, P., Shen, L., Wyrwicz, L., Yamaguchi, K., Skoczylas, T., Campos Bragagnoli, A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00797-2 · Cited by 3,041
Self-citationGastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Lordick, F., Carneiro, F., Cascinu, S., Fleitas, T., Haustermans, K., Piessen, G., Vogel, A., & Smyth, E. C. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004 · Cited by 1,503
Shitara, K., Van Cutsem, E., Bang, Y.-J., Fuchs, C., Wyrwicz, L., Lee, K.-W., Kudaba, I., Garrido, M., Chung, H. C., Lee, J., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3370 · Cited by 1,141
Self-citationKang, Y.-K., Chen, L.-T., Ryu, M.-H., Oh, D.-Y., Oh, S. C., Chung, H. C., Lee, K.-W., Omori, T., Shitara, K., Sakuramoto, S., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00692-6 · Cited by 800
Self-citationOesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., van Grieken, N. C. T., Vogel, A., & Smyth, E. C. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003 · Cited by 730
Rha, S. Y., Oh, D.-Y., Yañez, P., Bai, Y., Ryu, M.-H., Lee, J., Rivera, F., Alves, G. V., Garrido, M., Shiu, K.-K., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00515-6 · Cited by 690
Self-citationEllis, L. M., Bernstein, D. S., Voest, E. E., Berlin, J. D., Sargent, D., Cortazar, P., Garrett-Mayer, E., Herbst, R. S., Lilenbaum, R. C., Sima, C., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.53.8009 · Cited by 442
Xu, J., Jiang, H., Pan, Y., Gu, K., Cang, S., Han, L., Shu, Y., Li, J., Zhao, J., Pan, H., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19918 · Cited by 406
Self-citationThe binding of an anti-PD-1 antibody to FcγRΙ has a profound impact on its biological functions
Zhang, T., Song, X., Xu, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Gong, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-018-2160-x · Cited by 290
Cited by
Yang, H., Wang, F., Hallemeier, C. L., Lerut, T., & Fu, J. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02226-8 · Cited by 299
Fizazi, K., Clarke, N. W., De Santis, M., Uemura, H., Fay, A. P., Karadurmus, N., Kwiatkowski, M., Alvarez-Fernandez, C., Jiang, S., Sotelo, M., et al. (2026) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.10.004 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiu, M.-Z., Oh, D.-Y., Kato, K., Arkenau, T., Tabernero, J., Correa, M. C., Zimina, A. V., Bai, Y., Shi, J., Lee, K.-W., Wang, J., Poddubskaya, E., Pan, H., Rha, S. Y., Zhang, R., Hirano, H., Spigel, D., Yamaguchi, K., Chao, Y., Wyrwicz, L., Disel, U., Cid, R. P., Fornaro, L., Evesque, L., Wang, H., Xu, Y., Li, J., Sheng, T., Yang, S., Li, L., Moehler, M., & Xu, R.-H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2024-05-28
- Volume
- 385
- Pages
- e078876
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399103914
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 74.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first line treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: RATIONALE-305 randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj-2023-078876
- The paper
- Qiu, M.-Z., Oh, D.-Y., Kato, K., Arkenau, T., Tabernero, J., Correa, M. C., Zimina, A. V., Bai, Y., Shi, J., Lee, K.-W., Wang, J., Poddubskaya, E., Pan, H., Rha, S. Y., Zhang, R., Hirano, H., Spigel, D., Yamaguchi, K., Chao, Y., . . . Xu, R.-H. (2024). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first line treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: RATIONALE-305 randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.