The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Appreciation of Mitral Stenosis--II
Open accessAbstract
The dosage and management of these cases, and the side-effects seen in the course of their treatment, are discussed.The cortisone used in this study was partly provided from a generous gift made jointly to the Medical Research Council and the Nuffield Foundation by Messrs. Merck & Co. Inc., and partly from the Ministry of Health.We wish to acknowledge the valuable assistance given to us by Dr. B.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evans, W., & Swann, P. (1954) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.16.2.189 · Cited by 386
Natural History of Mitral Stenosis: A Review
SELZER, A., & COHN, K. E. (1972) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.45.4.878 · Cited by 301
Cardiac Auscultation: Rediscovering the Lost Art
Chizner, M. A. (2008) · Current Problems in Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2008.03.003 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1954-05-15
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4871
- Pages
- 1113-1124
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2616790969
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Appreciation of Mitral Stenosis--II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.1.4871.1113
- The paper
- Wood, P. (1954). An Appreciation of Mitral Stenosis--II. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4871.1113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
