Cited by 109Maternal and fetal healthcareBlood transfusion and managementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Precise estimation of postpartum haemorrhage: Difficulties and importance

Open access
Brant, H. A.·1967·BMJ

Abstract

The accepted definition of postpartum haemorrhage is an estimated blood loss of at least 500 ml. after vaginal delivery. Estimation of blood loss is often unreliable, for few attendants have a clear appreciation of the appearance of 500 ml. of blood soaked into linen and the other accoutrements of delivery. Because of the failure to recognize the extent of haemorrhage, its true importance in maternal morbidity and mortality tends to be missed. Several methods have been used in attempts to measure blood loss accurately. Gatch and Little (1924) extracted haemoglobin and measured it as acid haematin by photometric comparison with a series of acid haematin solutions prepared by diluting the patient's venous blood. Pilcher and Sheard (1937) used the spectrophotometer to measure oxy haemoglobin concentrations. Coller et al. (1944) compared preand post-delivery haemoglobin and plasma protein con centrations. Gahres et al. (1962) used chromium-51-labelled red cells to compare the red cell mass before and after delivery, while Spoerel and Heagy (1962) used radioiodinated serum albumin to compare plasma volumes before and after delivery. Murdoch (1958) attempted complete collections in calibrated receptacles. The aim of the present investigation was to measure the amount of bleeding at vaginal delivery. In order to prevent confusion the estimate made by the attendant will be referred to as the recorded blood loss. The loss determined subse quently by calculation, using the washing-machine extraction method, is referred to as the measured loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.1.5537.398

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual estimation of blood loss has long been established as an inaccurate measure that can potentially lead to delays in timely recognition and response to obstetric hemorrhage.

    “Visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) has long been established as an inaccurate measure that can potentially lead to delays in timely recognition and response to obstetric hemorrhage (Al Kadri et al., 2011;Brant, 1967).”

    From Quantification of Blood Loss: AWHONN Practice Brief Number 13 (2021) · cites this paper as Brant, 1967

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]10. Pilcher, F., and Sheard, C. (1937). Proc. Mayo Clin., 12, 209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brant, H. A.
Corresponding author
Brant, H. A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1967-02-18
Volume
1
Issue
5537
Pages
398-400
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2087392115
Cited by
109
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum hemorrhage, blood loss estimation, vaginal delivery, maternal morbidity, maternal mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Volume, Female, Hemoglobins, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Pregnancy, Pulse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review