Shortening hospital stay for psychiatric care: effect on patients and their families
Open accessAbstract
A one-year cohort of patients from a defined catchment area with acute functional disorders were allocated at random to brief care (experimental group) or standard care (control group) in hospital to examine the effect of shortening hospital stay on the clinical and social functioning of patients and the distress abnormal functioning caused to others. A total of 127 patients were interviewed on entry to the study, and 106 were followed up. The brief care group had significantly shorter mean and median lengths of stay than the control group, but there was no difference between the groups in the number of days spent in hospital during subsequent admissions. The groups were well matched for clinical and social variables. Rates of improvement over 13 weeks were essentially the same by all measures of outcome, including the Present State Examination and Patient's Behaviour Assessment Scale, which was developed for the study to measure deterioration in behaviour and social functioning and adverse effects and distress on others. There was no difference between the two groups in burden to the community supporting services, social security requirements, or GP attendances. Improvement rates were nearly identical on all measures within and across diagnostic subgroups. Brief care resulted in a 33% reduction in average length of stay compared with the year before but was associated with a corresponding increase in day hospital use. The short-stay policy continued the year after the study finished. The findings confirm the value of shortening hospital stay and improving day care facilities for most localities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that improvement was most rapid after psychiatric hospitalization is consistent with earlier studies reporting depressive symptoms and suicide ideation reduction following the first week of admission or even brief intervention.
“their improvement was most rapid after psychiatric hospitalization, consistent with earlier studies that reported depressive symptoms and suicide ideation reduction following the first week of admission or even brief intervention”
From Time in treatment: Examining mental illness trajectories across inpatient psychiatric treatment (2020) · cites this paper as Hirsch et al., 1979
The EFFECT ON SUPPORTING SERVICES section says the most dramatic reduction in clinical symptoms occurred during the first two weeks of hospitalization, supporting the general point about rapid improvement. It does not identify reductions in depressive symptoms or suicidal ideation specifically, or place them in the first week or after a brief intervention. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- lGlick, I D, Hargreaves, W A, and Goldfield, W N, Archives of General Psychiatry, 1974, 30, 3630.
- Herz, M I, Endicott, J, and Spitzer, K L, American_Journal of Psychiatry, 1977, 134, 502.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marshall, M., Sledge, W., Wiersma, D., Crowther, R., Kluiter, H., Bond, G. R., Almaraz-Serrano, A., Roberts, C., Huxley, P., Creed, F., et al. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5210 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders
Marshall, M., Crowther, R., Sledge, W. H., Rathbone, J., & Soares-Weiser, K. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004026.pub2 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Residential alternatives to acute psychiatric hospital admission: systematic review
Lloyd-Evans, B., Slade, M., Jagielska, D., & Johnson, S. (2009) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058347 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Time in treatment: Examining mental illness trajectories across inpatient psychiatric treatment
Oh, H., Lee, J., Kim, S., Rufino, K. A., Fonagy, P., Oldham, J. M., Schanzer, B., & Patriquin, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hirsch, S. R., Platt, S., Knights, A., & Weyman, A.
- Affiliations
- Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
- Royal College of Physicians (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1979-02-17
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 6161
- Pages
- 442-446
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2082784923
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- psychiatric hospitalization, length of hospital stay, social functioning, family burden, day hospital, community mental health services, Present State Examination, psychiatric hospital admissions
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Mental Disorders, Catchment Area, Health, Day Care, Medical, Family, United Kingdom, Hospitals, District, Hospitals, General, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Length of Stay, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Random Allocation, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review