Cited by 94Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesMental Health Treatment and Access

Residential alternatives to acute psychiatric hospital admission: systematic review

Open access
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, Slade, Mike, Jagielska, Dorota, Johnson, Sonia·2009·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Reducing use of hospital wards and improving their quality are central aims of mental health service policy. However, no comprehensive synthesis is available of evidence on residential alternatives to standard acute psychiatric wards. Aims: To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of and satisfaction with residential alternatives to standard acute in-patient mental health services. Method: A systematic search identified controlled studies comparing residential alternatives with standard in-patient services. Studies were described and assessed for methodological quality. Results from higher quality studies are presented and discussed. Results: Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified. Nine studies of moderate quality provide no contraindication to identified alternative service models and limited preliminary evidence that community-based alternatives may be cheaper and individuals more satisfied than in standard acute wards. Conclusions: More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of service models and target populations for residential alternatives to standard acute wards. Community-based residential crisis services may provide a feasible and acceptable alternative to hospital admission for some people with acute mental illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058347

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bonsack C, Borgeat F, Dubois A. Impact of mental health services' specialization by diagnosis in Lausanne. I. Qualitative Study. Ann Med Psychol 2001; 159: 645-51.
  2. Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (eds J Higgins, S Green). Wiley, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd-Evans, B., Slade, M., Jagielska, D., & Johnson, S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-08
Volume
195
Issue
2
Pages
109-117
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2137295023
Cited by
94
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Service Delivery and Organisation Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
acute mental illness, deinstitutionalization, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Centers, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Hospitalization, Humans, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review