The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognosis of Intrathoracic Sarcoidosis in England
Open accessAbstract
Early in 1960 I surveyed the records of 230 patients with sarcoidosis whom I had first seen up to the end of the previous year, with special reference to the role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in aetiology, and in discus- sing them described the diagnostic criteria adopted (Scadding, 1960).A total of 136 first came under my observation before the end of June, 1955, and in the autumn of 1960 1 endeavoured to complete the review of this group, first seen five years or more previously, by obtaining information about the current state of those among them who had passed out of my super- vision.This paper describes the result of this review, with special reference to prognosis in relation to the intrathoracic changes.The patients were first seen with various types of intrathoracic change, and at widely differing intervals after the probable time of onset of sarcoidosis.An earlier review of them (Scadding, 1956) had suggested that prognosis might be related to the type of intra- thoracic change then found, even among those who showed no evidence of fibrosis at that time.For these reasons-I have divided the patients into four groups according to the type of change in the chest radiograph when I first saw them:Group 1: 32 patients; enlarged hilar lymph-nodes only.Group 2: 40 patients; mottled shadowing in the lungs with enlarged hilar lymph-nodes, either present or known to have been present in the past.Group 3: 37 patients; mottled shadowing in the lungs, without present or available past evidence of enlargement of hilar lymph-nodes.Group 4: 27 patients; radiographic and clinical features suggesting fibrosis, usually in addition to mottled shadowing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis
Sones, M., & Israel, H. L. (1960) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(60)90009-7 · Cited by 140
Cited by
(1999) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.ats4-99 · Cited by 1,902
Clinical Characteristics of Patients in a Case Control Study of Sarcoidosis
BAUGHMAN, R. P., TEIRSTEIN, A. S., JUDSON, M. A., ROSSMAN, M. D., YEAGER, H., BRESNITZ, E. A., DePALO, L., HUNNINGHAKE, G., IANNUZZI, M. C., JOHNS, C. J., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2104046 · Cited by 1,808
A Concise Review of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis
Baughman, R. P., Culver, D. A., & Judson, M. A. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201006-0865ci · Cited by 536
Celada, L. J., Kropski, J. A., Herazo-Maya, J. D., Luo, W., Creecy, A., Abad, A. T., Chioma, O. S., Lee, G., Hassell, N. E., Shaginurova, G. I., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aar8356 · Cited by 363
Teirstein, A. S., Machac, J., Almeida, O., Lu, P., Padilla, M. L., & Iannuzzi, M. C. (2007) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.07-1178 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Scadding, J. G.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1961-11-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5261
- Pages
- 1165-1172
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2004400845
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of Intrathoracic Sarcoidosis in England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.2.5261.1165
- The paper
- Scadding, J. G. (1961). Prognosis of Intrathoracic Sarcoidosis in England. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5261.1165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.