The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel.
Open accessAbstract
A questionnaire to establish the presence of 15 symptoms thought to be typical of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was given to 109 unselected patients referred to gastroenterology or surgery clinics with abdominal pain or a change in bowel habit or both. Review of case records 17--26 months later established a definite diagnosis of IBS in 32 patients and of organic disease in 33. Four symptoms were significantly more common among patients with IBS--namely, distension, relief of pain with bowel movement, and looser and more frequent bowel movements with the onset of pain. Mucus and a sensation of incomplete evacuation were also common in these patients. The more of these symptoms that were present the more likely was it that the patient's pain or altered bowel habit, or both, was due to IBS. We conclude that a careful history can increase diagnostic confidence and reduce the amount of investigation in many patients with chronic abdominal pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–102 of 102
(2009) · doi:10.4166/kjg.2019.73.2.84 · Cited by 11
Alternating bowel pattern: what do people mean?
CHOUNG, R. S., LOCKE, G. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., MELTON, L. J., & TALLEY, N. J. (2006) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02953.x · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, A. P., Thompson, W. G., Heaton, K. W., & Morris, A. F.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1978-09-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6138
- Pages
- 653-654
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2065019547
- Cited by
- 1,374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.