Cited by 5Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsInflammatory Bowel Disease

Alternating bowel pattern: what do people mean?

Open access
CHOUNG, R. S., LOCKE, G. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., MELTON, L. J., TALLEY, N. J.·2006·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: With the introduction of new therapies, the subgrouping of patients based on bowel pattern has become important. However, the appropriate definition of an alternating bowel pattern remains unclear. Aim: To determine if specific symptoms are reported by people with an alternating bowel pattern. Methods: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a series of population‐based surveys were undertaken in which valid self‐report gastrointestinal symptom questionnaires were mailed to 4029 randomly selected members of the community. One question asked was ‘How would you describe your usual bowel pattern in the last year'? Results: 3022 subjects (74%) provided questionnaire data and 2718 were eligible for this analysis, the mean age was 57 years, with a range of 20–98 years (median = 61). Of these, 9.2%, 2.5% and 7.6% reported their usual bowel pattern as being constipated, diarrhoea, or alternating respectively. At least 50% of those reporting alternating bowel pattern reported incomplete evacuation (63%), urgency (57%), straining (55%) and loose stool (50%). The proportion of alternators reporting each individual symptom was between that of diarrhoea and constipation except for mucus and incomplete evacuation; however, no symptom was unique to alternators. Conclusion: People who self‐report an alternating bowel pattern appear to represent a blend of constipation and diarrhoea symptoms, rather than a distinct subgroup.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02953.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHOUNG, R. S., LOCKE, G. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., MELTON, L. J., & TALLEY, N. J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
  • LOCKE, G. R.
  • MELTON, L. J.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
1749-1755
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2018598194
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
constipation, diarrhea, gastrointestinal symptoms, incomplete evacuation, bowel urgency, straining, mucus, symptom definition
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Constipation, Diarrhea, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review