The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50- and 30-microgram oestrogen preparations.
Open accessAbstract
Progestogens probably have metabolic effects that may contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular reactions associated with combined oestrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives. This possibility was investigated by a study of nearly 2000 reports to the Committee on Safety of Medicines from 1964 to 1977. The reports concerned preparations in which norethisterone acetate in doses of 1.0, 2.5, 3.0, or 4.0 mg was combined with 50 microgram of ethinyloestradiol and those in which levonorgestrel in doses of 150 or 250 microgram was combined with 30 microgram of ethinyloestradiol. Observed and expected numbers of reports were compared, using retail pharmacy purchase figures as a measure of the use of different preparations. There was a significant positive association between the dose of norethisterone acetate and deaths from stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD); this association was also found for all cases of these two conditions, fatal plus non-fatal. There were no associations of dose of norethisterone acetate with hypertension or venous thrombosis. The higher dose of levonorgestrel was associated with a possible excess of deaths, non-venous plus venous, and an excess of strokes. There was no association between dose of levonorgestrel and hypertension or venous thrombosis. The reports were also used to assess the relative safety of 30-microgram and 50-microgram oestrogen preparations. Those with 30 microgram of oestrogen were associated with significantly fewer reports of death and IHD (both fatal, and fatal plus non-fatal) than those with 50 microgram of oestrogen. In view of the large-scale move towards preparations with progressively lower oestrogen doses, there are no grounds for major changes in oral contraceptive practice. Within the range of preparations currently in use, however, there is a case for minimising the dose of progestogen to reduce the chances of thromboembolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral Contraceptives and Cardiovascular Disease
Stadel, B. V. (1981) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198109103051104 · Cited by 494
World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91927-9 · Cited by 453
Stegeman, B. H., de Bastos, M., Rosendaal, F. R., van Hylckama Vlieg, A., Helmerhorst, F. M., Stijnen, T., & Dekkers, O. M. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5298 · Cited by 420
Stroke in Users of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives
Petitti, D. B., Sidney, S., Bernstein, A., Wolf, S., Quesenberry, C., & Ziel, H. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199607043350102 · Cited by 329
Safety of medical treatments for endometriosis
Berlanda, N., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., & Vercellini, P. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740338.2016.1121991 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Meade, T. W., Greenberg, G., & Thompson, S. G.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1980-05-10
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 6224
- Pages
- 1157-1161
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1998935332
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50- and 30-microgram oestrogen preparations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.280.6224.1157
- The paper
- Meade, T. W., Greenberg, G., & Thompson, S. G. (1980). Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50- and 30-microgram oestrogen preparations. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.280.6224.1157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.