The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of urinary incontinence.
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of urinary incontinence was investigated by determining the number of incontinent patients under the care of various health and social service agencies in two London boroughs and by a postal survey of the 22 430 people aged 5 years and over on the practice lists of 12 general practitioners in different parts of the country. The prevalence of incontinence known to the health and social service agencies was 0.2% in women and 0.1% in men aged 15-64 and 2.5% in women and 1.3% in men aged 65 and over. The postal survey, to which 89% of the people whose correct address was known replied, showed a prevalence of urinary incontinence of 8.5% in women and 1.6% in men aged 15-64 and 11.6% in women and 6.9% in men aged 65 and over. Nulliparous women had a lower prevalence than those who had had one, two, or three babies, but within the parity range of one to three there were no differences in prevalence. The prevalence was appreciably increased in women who had had four or more babies. Incontinence was moderate or severe in a fifth of those who reported it in the postal survey, of whom less than a third were receiving health or social services for the condition. Incontinence is a common symptom, and many unrecognised cases appear to exist. There may be considerable scope for improving its management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence
OLSEN, A., SMITH, V, BERGSTROM, J., COLLING, J., & CLARK, A. (1997) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00058-6 · Cited by 3,335
The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders
Weber, A. M., Abrams, P., Brubaker, L., Cundiff, G., Davis, G., Dmochowski, R. R., Fischer, J., Hull, T., Nygaard, I., & Weidner, A. C. (2001) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/pl00004033 · Cited by 377
Paraiso, M. F. R., Ballard, L. A., Walters, M. D., Lee, J. C., & Mitchinson, A. R. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70085-6 · Cited by 235
A systematic review of the effects of estrogens for symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder
Cardozo, L., Lose, G., McClish, D., & Versi, E. (2004) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00581.x · Cited by 175
Urogenital ageing and its effect on sexual health in older British women
Barlow, D. H., Cardozo, L. D., Francis, R. M., Griffin, M., Hart, D. M., Stephens, E., & Sturdee, D. W. (1997) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10655.x · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, T. M., Plymat, K. R., Blannin, J., & Meade, T. W.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1980-11-08
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 6250
- Pages
- 1243-1245
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2042053041
- Cited by
- 935
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of urinary incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1243
- The paper
- Thomas, T. M., Plymat, K. R., Blannin, J., & Meade, T. W. (1980). Prevalence of urinary incontinence. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.