Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders

Open access
Weber, A. M., Abrams, P., Brubaker, L., Cundiff, G., Davis, G., Dmochowski, R. R., Fischer, J., Hull, T., Nygaard, I., Weidner, A. C.·2001·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Abstract: The lack of standardized terminology in pelvic floor disorders (pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and fecal incontinence) is a major obstacle to performing and interpreting research. The National Institutes of Health convened the Terminology Workshop for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders to: (1) agree on standard terms for defining conditions and outcomes; (2) make recommendations for minimum data collection for research; and (3) identify high priority issues for future research. Pelvic organ prolapse was defined by physical examination staging using the International Continence Society system. Stress urinary incontinence was defined by symptoms and testing; ‘cure’ was defined as no stress incontinence symptoms, negative testing, and no new problems due to intervention. Overactive bladder was defined as urinary frequency and urgency, with and without urge incontinence. Detrusor instability was defined by cystometry. For all urinary symptoms, defining ‘improvement’ after intervention was identified as a high priority. For fecal incontinence, more research is needed before recommendations can be made. A standard terminology for research on pelvic floor disorders is presented and areas of high priority for future research are identified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/pl00004033

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Weber, A. M., Abrams, P., Brubaker, L., Cundiff, G., Davis, G., Dmochowski, R. R., Fischer, J., Hull, T., Nygaard, I., & Weidner, A. C.
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2001-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
178-186
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W1977713039
Cited by
377
References
18
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/pl00004033
The paper
Weber, A. M., Abrams, P., Brubaker, L., Cundiff, G., Davis, G., Dmochowski, R. R., Fischer, J., Hull, T., Nygaard, I., & Weidner, A. C. (2001). The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders. International Urogynecology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00004033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.