The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial.
Open accessAbstract
A total of 744 elderly women with fractured neck of femur were classified into three groups according to anthropometric measurements on admission: group 1, well nourished; group 2, thin; group 3, very thin. Group 1 ate well and had a low mortality and a short rehabilitation time. The thinner the patients the lower their voluntary food intake, the higher their mortality and the longer their rehabilitation time. A series of 122 patients from groups 2 and 3 were entered postoperatively into a randomised controlled trial of overnight supplementary nasogastric tube feeding (4.2 MJ (1000 kcal), including 28 g protein) in addition to their normal ward diet. This treatment was associated with improvements not only in anthropometric and plasma protein measurements but also in clinical outcome, especially in the very thin group 3 patients. Rehabilitation time and hospital stay were shortened. Mortality in group 3 was less in the tube fed patients (8%) than in the controls (22%) but this difference did not reach statistical significance. One in five patients could not tolerate the nasogastric tube, but in the remainder the treatment caused no side effects and did not seriously diminish voluntary oral food intake by day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
KONDRUP, J. (2003) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5 · Cited by 3,063
Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review
Marik, P. E., & Zaloga, G. P. (2001) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200112000-00005 · Cited by 938
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849
Complications and Outcome After Acute Stroke: Does Dysphagia Matter?
Smithard, D. G., O'Neill, P. A., Park, C., Morris, J., Wyatt, R., England, R., & Martin, D. F. (1996) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.7.1200 · Cited by 734
Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty
CAMPBELL, A. J., & BUCHNER, D. M. (1997) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/26.4.315 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Bastow, M. D., Rawlings, J., & Allison, S. P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1983-11-26
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 6405
- Pages
- 1589-1592
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2092994596
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.287.6405.1589
- The paper
- Bastow, M. D., Rawlings, J., & Allison, S. P. (1983). Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.287.6405.1589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.