Cited by 938Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review

Marik, Paul E., Zaloga, Gary P.·2001·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of early enteral nutrition on the outcome of critically ill and injured patients. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, citation review of relevant primary and review articles, personal files, and contact with expert informants. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled studies that compared early with delayed enteral nutrition in hospitalized adult postoperative, trauma, head-injured, burn, or medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. From 161 articles screened, 27 were identified as randomized, controlled trials comparing early with delayed enteral nutrition and were included for data extraction. Of these, 12 were excluded. None of the studies included medical ICU patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Fifteen studies containing 753 subjects were analyzed. Descriptive and outcome data were extracted independently from the articles by the two reviewers. Main outcome measures were infections, noninfectious complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. The meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Early enteral nutrition was associated with a significantly lower incidence of infections (relative risk reduction, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.66; p =.00006; test for heterogeneity, p =.049) and a reduced length of hospital stay (mean reduction of 2.2 days; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-3.63 days; p =.004; test for heterogeneity, p =.0012). There were no significant differences in mortality or noninfectious complications between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis support the experimental data demonstrating the benefit of the early initiation of enteral nutrition. The results of this meta-analysis must, however, be interpreted with some caution because of the significant heterogeneity between studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marik, P. E., & Zaloga, G. P.
Affiliations
Suburban Hospital (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2264-2270
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074218333
Cited by
938
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 41
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
early enteral nutrition, delayed enteral nutrition, critically ill patients, trauma patients, postoperative patients, traumatic brain injury, burn patients, infection incidence, length of hospital stay, mortality, non-infectious complications, intensive care unit
MeSH terms
Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Infections, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Postoperative Care, Postoperative Complications, Risk, Time Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review