The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pigmentation and skin reaction to sun as risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study.
Open accessAbstract
Between 1 April 1979 and 31 March 1981, 904 residents of the four western provinces of Canada (population 6.5 million), were diagnosed as suffering from primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Of 801 patients aged 20-79 years, 665 (83%) were interviewed along with control subjects chosen at random from the general population and matched for age, sex, and province. After exclusion of 70 subjects with lentigo maligna or acral lentiginous melanoma, comparisons of the 595 case-control pairs showed that light hair, skin, and eye colour, a history of heavy freckling in adolescence, and a tendency to burn readily and tan poorly in the sun were significant risk factors for melanoma. The strongest primary associations were with blond hair (relative risk 7.1 compared with black hair), light colour of unexposed skin (relative risk 2.4), and severe freckling (relative risk 2.1). These associations were independent of ethnic origin and of recorded amount of exposure to the sun and were somewhat stronger for superficial spreading than for nodular melanoma. This study is the largest and most detailed of an incident series of melanomas to be published to date. The results were consistent with other studies reporting associations between melanoma and poor tanning ability, a tendency to burn easily, and a history of sunburn and showed that light hair colour was the strongest risk factor for the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial differences in melanoma incidence
Crombie, I. K. (1979) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1979.165 · Cited by 124
Cited by
The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer
Armstrong, B. K., & Kricker, A. (2001) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00198-1 · Cited by 1,811
Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure
Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Picconi, O., Boyle, P., & Melchi, C. F. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016 · Cited by 1,266
Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Zanetti, R., Masini, C., Boyle, P., & Melchi, C. F. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034 · Cited by 787
Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies
Whiteman, D. C., Whiteman, C. A., & Green, A. C. (2001) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1008980919928 · Cited by 633
Number of melanocytic nevi as a major risk factor for malignant melanoma
Holly, E. A., Kelly, J. W., Shpall, S. N., & Chiu, S.-H. (1987) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70230-8 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Elwood, J. M., Gallagher, R. P., Hill, G. B., Spinelli, J. J., Pearson, J. C., & Threlfall, W.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1984-01-14
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 6411
- Pages
- 99-102
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2003100189
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pigmentation and skin reaction to sun as risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.288.6411.99
- The paper
- Elwood, J. M., Gallagher, R. P., Hill, G. B., Spinelli, J. J., Pearson, J. C., & Threlfall, W. (1984). Pigmentation and skin reaction to sun as risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6411.99
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.