Cited by 124Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screeningmelanin and skin pigmentation

Racial differences in melanoma incidence

Open access
Crombie, I K·1979·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The incidences of malignant melanoma recorded by 59 population-based cancer registries were investigated to determine the effects of racial and skin-colour differences. White populations exhibited a wide range of melanoma incidences and females commonly, though not invariably, had a higher incidence than males. Non-white populations experienced in general a much lower incidence of melanoma although there was some overlap of white and non-white rates. No predominant sex difference emerged among non-whites. Populations of African descent were found to have a higher incidence than those of Asiatic origin, but it was concluded that this was due largely to the high frequency of tumours among Africans on the sole of the foot. A clear negative correlation between degree of skin pigmentation and melanoma incidence emerged for the exposed body sites. These data provide strong support for the hypotheses that UV radiation is a major cause of malignant melanoma and that melanin pigmentation protects against it. Further research is required to elucidate the aetiology of melanoma of the sole of the foot.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1979.165

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Melanoma is associated with UV light exposure and European ancestry, occurring at very low rates in Africans, African Americans, and light-skinned Asians.

    “Incidentally, melanoma is not only associated with UV light exposure but also with European ancestry, occurring at very low rates in Africans, African Americans, and even light-skinned Asians (32)(33)(34).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crombie, I. K.
Affiliations
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Crombie, I K
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1979-08
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
185-193
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2039804149
Cited by
124
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
melanoma, melanoma incidence, racial differences, skin pigmentation, skin colour, African ancestry, sex differences, ultraviolet radiation, cancer etiology
MeSH terms
Arm, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Leg, Male, Melanoma, Registries, Sex Factors, Skin Neoplasms, Skin Pigmentation, Black People, White People, Asian People, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review