The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition.
Open accessAbstract
One hundred and eighteen patients with normal gastrointestinal function were randomly allocated to one of three feeding regimens in a double blind study to determine the relation between the tonicity of the diet and gastrointestinal side effects related to the diet and to evaluate the efficacy of "starter" regimens in reducing gastrointestinal side effects during enteral nutrition. Patients received a hypertonic diet with an osmolality of 430 mmol (mosmol)/kg (group 1), the same diet but with the osmolality increasing from 145 to 430 mmol/kg over the first four days (group 2), or an isotonic diet (300 mmol/kg) (group 3). All diets were prepared aseptically and administered by 24 hour nasogastric infusion. The mean daily nitrogen intake in group 1 was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than that in both groups 2 and 3, and the mean overall daily nitrogen balance was significantly better (p less than 0.05) in group 1 than groups 2 and 3. The incidence of side effects related to the diet was similar in all three groups, but diarrhoea was significantly (p less than 0.001) associated with concurrent treatment with antibiotics. These findings show that undiluted hypertonic diet results in significantly better nitrogen intake and balance, that starter regimens reduce nutrient intake but not symptoms, and that diarrhoea is significantly related to treatment with antibiotics and not to administration of an undiluted hypertonic polymeric diet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gottschlich, M. M., Jenkins, M., Warden, G. D., Baumer, T., Havens, P., Snook, J. T., & Alexander, J. W. (1990) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607190014003225 · Cited by 314
Chowdhury, A. H., Murray, K., Hoad, C. L., Costigan, C., Marciani, L., Macdonald, I. A., Bowling, T. E., & Lobo, D. N. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001110 · Cited by 84
Enteral feeding: The effect on faecal output, the faecal microflora and SCFA concentrations
Whelan, K., Judd, P. A., Preedy, V. R., & Taylor, M. A. (2004) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2003317 · Cited by 65
Steel, C., & Wile, H. (2024) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1002/ncp.11069 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Keohane, P. P., Attrill, H., Love, M., Frost, P., & Silk, D. B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1984-03-03
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 6418
- Pages
- 678-680
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2094532966
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.288.6418.678
- The paper
- Keohane, P. P., Attrill, H., Love, M., Frost, P., & Silk, D. B. (1984). Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6418.678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.