The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial.
Open accessAbstract
Over three years 285 randomly selected subjects aged 75 years or more and living in a suburb of Copenhagen were visited every three months in their own homes (the intervention group) to assess whether scheduled medically and socially preventive intervention would influence the number of admissions to hospitals or nursing homes, the number of contacts with general practice, or mortality. A randomly selected group of 287 people of the same age and sex were visited during the final three months of the study (the control group). Two hundred and nineteen admissions to hospitals (4884 bed days) were registered for the intervention group compared with 271 (6442 bed days) for the control group. Especially during the second half of the study, a significant reduction in the number of admissions to hospitals was seen in the intervention group. Twenty people in the intervention group and 29 in the control group moved into nursing homes (p greater than 0.05). The corresponding numbers of deaths were 56 and 75 (p less than 0.05). No difference was seen in the number of contacts with general practice. Significantly fewer emergency medical calls, however, were registered for the intervention group. Subjects in the intervention group benefited from the regular visits and the increased distribution of aids and modifications to their homes to which these led. The regular visits probably also produced an important increase in confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6 · Cited by 780
Stuck, A. E., Egger, M., Hammer, A., Minder, C. E., & Beck, J. C. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.8.1022 · Cited by 675
Rubenstein, L. Z., Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., & Wieland, D. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05927.x · Cited by 597
Elkan, Kendrick, Hewitt, Robinson, Tolley, Blair, Dewey, Williams, & Brummell (2000) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta4130 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendriksen, C., Lund, E., & Strømgård, E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1984-12-01
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 6457
- Pages
- 1522-1524
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2020825558
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1522
- The paper
- Hendriksen, C., Lund, E., & Strømgård, E. (1984). Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.