Cited by 597Frailty in Older AdultsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence

Rubenstein, Laurence Z., Stuck, Andreas E., Siu, Albert L., Wieland, Darryl·1991·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a technique for multidimensional diagnosis of frail elderly people with the purpose of planning and/or delivering medical, psychosocial, and rehabilitative care. When comprehensive geriatric assessment is coupled with some therapy, then the term geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) will be used. Following a brief history of comprehensive geriatric assessment, we describe the varied patterns of GEM program organization and review the literature of studies examining GEM effectiveness. Program diversity complicates drawing firm conclusions about GEM effects; however, the vast majority of studies report positive, if not uniformly significant, results. Our analysis suggests that much of the variability in findings is due to sample size limitations In order to reach conclusions of program effects across studies and to avoid problems of small sample sizes, we undertook a formal meta‐analysis. In this initial meta‐analysis, we sought to evaluate the effect of GEM programs on a single outcome: mortality. We pooled all published GEM controlled trials into four major groups: inpatient consultation services, inpatient GEM units, home assessment services, and outpatient GEM programs. Meta‐analysis of 6‐month mortality demonstrates a 39% reduction of mortality for inpatient consultation services (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.81, P = 0.0008) and a 37% reduction of mortality for inpatient GEM units (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.42–0.93, P = 0.02). Home assessment services reduced mortality by 29% (odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.90, P = 0.005). On the other hand, no significant survival effect was found for outpatient GEM programs (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.61–1.49). Further use of meta‐analytic techniques should be employed to clarify the effect of GEM on other important outcomes (eg, functional status, use of hospitals and nursing homes) as well as to identify program characteristics most effective in achieving these benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05927.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been applied successfully beyond elderly care medicine.

    “has been applied successfully beyond elderly care medicine (112, 113).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [112]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubenstein, L. Z., Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., & Wieland, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rubenstein, Laurence Z.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-09
Volume
39
Issue
S1
Pages
8S-16S; discussion 17S
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2090645934
Cited by
597
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
geriatric evaluation and management, comprehensive geriatric assessment, frail elderly, mortality, program effectiveness, sample size limitations
MeSH terms
Aged, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, United States, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Geriatric Assessment, Survival Analysis, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review