The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children misdiagnosed as sexual abuse
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and sexual abuse.
Warrington, S. A., & de San Lazaro, C. (1996) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.75.6.512 · Cited by 80
Te, B., Julien, D., Mar, K., Liu, R., & Kirshen, C. (2026) · Pediatric Dermatology · doi:10.1111/pde.70112 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Priestley, B. L., & Bleehen, S. S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1987-07-18
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 6591
- Pages
- 211-211
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2064465297
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- lichen sclerosus, misdiagnosis, sexual abuse, children, genital skin disease, differential diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Anus Diseases, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Skin Diseases, Vulvar Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
