The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mental health, job satisfaction, and job stress among general practitioners.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To identify sources of job stress associated with high levels of job dissatisfaction and negative mental wellbeing among general practitioners in England. DESIGN--Multivariate analysis of large database of general practitioners compiled from results of confidential questionnaire survey. Data obtained on independent variables of job stress, demographic factors, and personality. Dependent variables were mental health, job satisfaction, alcohol consumption, and smoking. SETTING--National sample of general practitioners studied by university department of organisational psychology. SUBJECTS--One thousand eight hundred seventeen general practitioners selected at random by 20 family practitioner committees in England. INTERVENTIONS--None. END POINT--Determination of the combination of independent variables that were predictive of mental health and job satisfaction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Women general practitioners both had job satisfaction and showed positive signs of mental wellbeing in contrast with other normative groups. Conversely, male doctors showed significantly higher anxiety scores than the norms, had less job satisfaction, and drank more alcohol than their women counterparts. Multivariate analysis disclosed four job stressors that were predictive of high levels of job dissatisfaction and lack of mental wellbeing; these were demands of the job and patients' expectations, interference with family life, constant interruptions at work and home, and practice administration. CONCLUSIONS--There may be substantial benefit in providing a counselling service for general practitioners and other health care workers who suffer psychological pressure from their work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shanafelt, T. D., Sloan, J. A., & Habermann, T. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00117-7 · Cited by 813
Burnout in Healthcare Workers: Prevalence, Impact and Preventative Strategies
De Hert, S. (2020) · Local and Regional Anesthesia · doi:10.2147/lra.s240564 · Cited by 746
Chisholm, C. D., Collison, E. K., Nelson, D. R., & Cordell, W. H. (2000) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x · Cited by 610
The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach
Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019 · Cited by 570
Healthy Mind—Healthy Organization—A Proactive Approach to Occupational Stress
Cooper, C. L., & Cartwright, S. (1994) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679404700405 · Cited by 497
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, C. L., Rout, U., & Faragher, B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-02-11
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 6670
- Pages
- 366-370
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2023019419
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental health, job satisfaction, and job stress among general practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.298.6670.366
- The paper
- Cooper, C. L., Rout, U., & Faragher, B. (1989). Mental health, job satisfaction, and job stress among general practitioners. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6670.366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.