The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Palliative care: views of patients and their families.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To investigate the current problems and needs of terminally ill cancer patients and their family members, and to discover their views of hospital, community, and support team services. DESIGN--Prospective study of patients and families by questionnaire interviews in the patients' homes. SETTING--Inner London and north Kent (London suburbs). SUBJECTS--65 Patients, each with a member of their family or a career. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Ratings of eight current problems and ratings and comments on three services-hospital doctors and nurses, general practitioners and district nurses, and the support team staff-obtained after a minimum of two weeks' care from palliative care support teams. RESULTS--Effect of anxiety on the patient's nearest career. and symptom control were rated as the most severe current problems by both patients and families; a few patients and families identified other severe problems. Families' ratings of pain control, symptom control, and effect of anxiety on the patient were significantly worse than the patients' ratings (p less than 0.05). Support teams received the most praise, being rated by 58 (89%) patients and 59 (91%) of family members as good as excellent. General practitioners and district nurses were rated good or excellent by 46 (71%) patients and 46 (71%) family members, but six (9%) in each group rated the service as poor or very bad, and ratings in the inner London district were significantly worse than those in the outer London district. Hospital doctors and nurses were rated good or excellent by 22 (34%) patients and 35 (54%) of family members, and 14 (22%) patients and 15 (23%) family members rated this service as poor or very bad. Negative comments referred to communication (especially at diagnosis), coordination of services, the attitude of the doctor, delays in diagnosis, and difficulties in getting doctors to visit at home. Family members were more satisfied with the services than were patients. CONCLUSIONS--Palliative care needs to include both the patient and family because the needs of the family may exceed those of the patient. Support teams and some hospital and community doctors and nurses met the perceived needs of dying patients and families, but better education and organisation of services are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years
van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J., de Rijke, J. M., Kessels, A. G., Schouten, H. C., van Kleef, M., & Patijn, J. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm056 · Cited by 1,923
Do Hospital-Based Palliative Teams Improve Care for Patients or Families at the End of Life?
Higginson, I. J., Finlay, I., Goodwin, D. M., Cook, A. M., Hood, K., Edwards, A. G. K., Douglas, H.-R., & Norman, C. E. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00406-7 · Cited by 344
Self-citationHarding, R., List, S., Epiphaniou, E., & Jones, H. (2012) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216311409613 · Cited by 160
Communication and choice in dying from heart disease
Mccarthy, M., Addington Hall, J., & Ley, M. (1997) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107689709000304 · Cited by 77
Self-citationDavis, E. L., Deane, F. P., & Lyons, G. C. B. (2015) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951514000431 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Higginson, I., Wade, A., & McCarthy, M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-08-04
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 6746
- Pages
- 277-281
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2055765042
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Palliative care: views of patients and their families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.301.6746.277
- The paper
- Higginson, I., Wade, A., & McCarthy, M. (1990). Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6746.277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.