The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To observe the effects of introducing an acute pain service to the general surgical wards of a large teaching hospital. DESIGN--A study in seven stages: (1) an audit of current hospital practice succeeded by the sequential introduction to the general surgical wards of (2) pain assessment charts; (3) an algorithm to allow more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia; (4) increased use of local anaesthetic techniques of wound infiltration and nerve blocks; (5) an information sheet for patients about postoperative pain; (6) the introduction of patient controlled analgesia; (7) a repeat audit of hospital practice. Data were collected on each patient 24 hours after operation. SETTING--University Hospital of Wales, which has both district general and tertiary referral functions. PATIENTS--2035 patients over nine months from all surgical specialties (excluding cardiac) at the hospital. General surgical operations were studied in detail and separated into major, intermediate, and minor for data collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--A change in the median visual analogue pain scores 24 hours after surgery for pain during relaxation, pain on movement, and pain on deep inspiration at each stage of the study. RESULTS--There was a reduction in median visual analogue scores during the study. The median (95% confidence interval) scores for pain during relaxation decreased from 45 (34 to 53) in stage 1 to 16 (10 to 20) in stage 7 for major surgical procedures. Pain on movement decreased from 78 (66 to 80) to 46 (38 to 48), and pain on deep inspiration decreased from 64 (48 to 78) to 36 (31 to 38). The reductions in median scores for intermediate and minor operative procedures showed similar patterns. CONCLUSIONS--The introduction of an acute pain service to the general surgical wards led to considerable improvement in the level of postoperative pain as assessed by visual analogue scores. Simple techniques of regular pain assessment and the more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia as a result of using an algorithm were particularly effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,204
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,845
Nonparametric Statistics : for the Behavioral Sciences
Siegel, S. (1956) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 3,287
The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
REVILL, S. I., ROBINSON, J. O., ROSEN, M., & HOGG, M. I. J. (1976) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x · Cited by 1,255
Development of an Anesthesiology-based Postoperative Pain Management Service
Ready, L. B., Oden, R., Chadwick, H. S., Benedetti, C., Rooke, G. A., Caplan, R., & Wild, L. M. (1988) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-198801000-00016 · Cited by 443
THE FIRST YEAR'S EXPERIENCE OF AN ACUTE PAIN SERVICE
WHEATLEY, R. G., MADEJ, T. H., JACKSON, I. J. B., & HUNTER, D. (1991) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/67.3.353 · Cited by 185
Variables of patient‐controlled analgesia 2. concurrent infusion
Owen, H., SZEKELY, S. M., Plummer, J. L., Cushnie, J. M., & Mather, L. E. (1989) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11088.x · Cited by 156
Baños, J.-E., Bosch, F., Cañellas, M., Bassols, A., Ortega, F. B., & Bigorra, J. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 100
Self‐administered nalbuphine, morphine and pethidine
BAHAR, M., Rosen, M. J., & Vickers, M. D. (1985) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10888.x · Cited by 85
Cited by
Chou, R., Gordon, D. B., de Leon-Casasola, O. A., Rosenberg, J. M., Bickler, S., Brennan, T., Carter, T., Cassidy, C. L., Chittenden, E. H., Degenhardt, E., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008 · Cited by 3,171
Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data
Dolin, S. J., Cashman, J. N., & Bland, J. M. (2002) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.409 · Cited by 737
McQuay, & Moore (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2120 · Cited by 131
Kekecs, Z., Nagy, T., & Varga, K. (2014) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000466 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, T. H., Crosby, D. L., Harmer, M., Lloyd, S. M., Lunn, J. N., Rees, G. A., Roberts, D. E., & Webster, J. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-11-14
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 6863
- Pages
- 1187-1193
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1996413809
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1187
- The paper
- Gould, T. H., Crosby, D. L., Harmer, M., Lloyd, S. M., Lunn, J. N., Rees, G. A., Roberts, D. E., & Webster, J. A. (1992). Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.