The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
Abstract
A linear analogue for rating pain with 10, 15 and 20 cm lines is significantly less variable than a 5 cm line (mean error of 15 cm line is 0-19%, 95% confidence limits for the group +/- 2% and an inood correlation between repeated ratins of a recalled pain distant in time. The variance of the rating is significantly less than the repeated rating of a random mark. The linear analogue rating of a constant pain stimulus is reproducible and changes in rating are likely to be real changes of opinion. Pethidine 150 mg intramuscularly had no significant effect, tested 30 minutes after the administration, on the accuracy or reproducibility of the analogue rating. A linear analogue seems a suitable method of recording the patient's opion of a severe pain such as that of labour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 · Cited by 3,921
A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770130405 · Cited by 2,580
Flint, A., Raben, A., Blundell, J., & Astrup, A. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083 · Cited by 2,238
Pain catastrophizing and neural responses to pain among persons with fibromyalgia
Gracely, R. H. (2004) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh098 · Cited by 892
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain
Ostelo, R. W. J. G., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003 · Cited by 840
Metadata
- Authors
- REVILL, S. I., ROBINSON, J. O., ROSEN, M., & HOGG, M. I. J.
- Venue
- Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1191-1198
- ISSN
- 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2093975594
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x
- The paper
- REVILL, S. I., ROBINSON, J. O., ROSEN, M., & HOGG, M. I. J. (1976). The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
