The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the performance of the sequential combination of serum CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography in screening for ovarian cancer. DESIGN--The serum CA 125 concentration of each subject was determined and those with a concentration > or = 30 U/ml were recalled for abdominal ultrasonography. If ultrasonography gave abnormal results surgical investigation was arranged. Volunteers were followed up by annual postal questionnaire. SETTING--General practice, occupational health departments, ovarian cancer screening clinic. SUBJECTS--22,000 women volunteers who were postmenopausal and aged over 45 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Apparent sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, years of cancer detected. RESULTS--41 women had a positive screening result and were investigated surgically. 11 had ovarian cancer (true positive result) and 30 had other disorders or no abnormality (false positive result). Of the 21,959 volunteers with a negative screening result, eight subsequently presented clinically with ovarian cancer (false negative result) and 21,951 had not developed ovarian cancer during follow up (apparent true negative result). The screening protocol achieved a specificity of 99.9%, a positive predictive value of 26.8%, and an apparent sensitivity of 78.6% and 57.9% at one year and two year follow up respectively. The estimated number of years of cancer detected by the prevalence screen was 1.4 years. CONCLUSIONS--This screening protocol is highly specific for ovarian cancer and can detect a substantial proportion of cases at a preclinical stage. Further investigation is required to determine the effect of the screening protocol on the ratio of early to late stage disease detected and on mortality from ovarian cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lin, J. S., Bowles, E. J. A., Williams, S. B., & Morrison, C. C. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0562 · Cited by 1,082
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Jacobs, I. J., Skates, S. J., MacDonald, N., Menon, U., Rosenthal, A. N., Davies, A. P., Woolas, R., Jeyarajah, A. R., Sibley, K., Lowe, D. G., et al. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10261-1 · Cited by 560
Self-citationHenderson, J. T., Webber, E. M., & Sawaya, G. F. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21421 · Cited by 348
(2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1174 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs, I., Davies, A. P., Bridges, J., Stabile, I., Fay, T., Lower, A., Grudzinskas, J. G., & Oram, D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1993-04-17
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 6884
- Pages
- 1030-1034
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2005426017
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1030
- The paper
- Jacobs, I., Davies, A. P., Bridges, J., Stabile, I., Fay, T., Lower, A., Grudzinskas, J. G., & Oram, D. (1993). Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.