Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 149

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interactions between people's diet and their smoking habits: the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults.

Margetts, B M, Jackson, A A·1993·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To compare diet, nutrient intakes, and biochemical measures between smokers and non-smokers. DESIGN--Analysis of data collected in cross sectional survey conducted in 1986 and 1987. Subjects were recruited from electoral wards in England, Wales, and Scotland to reflect the regional distribution of the population. SUBJECTS--2197 subjects (70% of those asked) aged between 16 and 64 undertook dietary assessment. Of these, 1842 subjects were considered to have kept a record typical of their usual dietary intake and had given data on smoking, and their results were analysed: 1224 non-smokers (631 men), 359 light smokers (166 men), and 259 heavy smokers (153 men). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Differences in dietary, nutrient, and biochemical measures between nonsmokers and smokers. RESULTS--Smokers ate more white bread, sugar, cooked meat dishes, butter, and whole milk and less wholemeal bread, high fibre breakfast cereals, fruit, and carrots. Smokers had lower intakes of polyunsaturated fat, protein, carbohydrate, fibre, iron, carotene, and ascorbic acid. Adjusting for other covariates did not substantially alter the pattern of intakes. At the same dietary intake of carotenoids smokers were more likely to have lower circulating serum beta carotene concentrations than non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS--The diet and nutrient intakes and circulating levels of nutrients of smokers were different from those of non-smokers. Smokers were more likely to have an imbalance between the dietary intake of antioxidant nutrients and the metabolic demand for antioxidant protection. This imbalance is likely to make smokers more susceptible to oxidative damage. Smokers are at increased risk of chronic disease because their diets are different and because smoking creates an altered pattern of demand for specific nutrients. The diets of smokers not only fail to meet the unusual requirements for specific nutrients to satisfy the altered pattern of demand but are likely to exacerbate the damage caused by smoking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.307.6916.1381

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Thompson RL, Margetts BM, Wood DA, Jackson AA. Cigarette smoking and food and nutrient intakes in relation to coronary heart disease. Nutrition Research Reviews 1992;5:131-52. · DOI
  2. Halliwell B. Cigarette smoking and health: a radical view. J R Soc Health 1993;113:91-6. · DOI
  3. Steinberg D, Parthasarthy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witzturm JL. Beyond cholesterol: modifications of low-density lipoproteins that increase its atherogenicity. NEnglJMed 1989;320:915-24. · DOI
  4. Carroll KK, Parenteau HI. A proposed mechanism for effects of diet on mammary cancer. Nutr Cancer 1991;16:79-83. · DOI
  5. Kish L. Survey sampling. London: Wiley, 1965.
  6. Cade J, Margetts BM. The relationship between diet and smoking: is the diet of smokers different?J Epidemiol Community Health 1991;45:270-2. · DOI
  7. Wichelow MJ, Erzinclioglu SW, Cox BD. A comparison of the diets of nonsmokers and smokers. BrJAddict 1991;86:71-81.
  8. Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Brown CA, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Nutrient intake by duration of ex-smoking in the Scottish Heart Study. Br J Nutr 1993;69:315-32. · DOI
  9. Strickland D, Graves K, Lando H. Smoking status and dietary fats. Prev Med 1992;21:228-36. · DOI
  10. Church DF, Pryor WA. Free-radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications. Entiron Health Perspect 1985;64: 111-26. · DOI
  11. Bridges RB, Chow CK, Rehm SR Micronutrient status and immune function in smokers. Ann N YAcad Sci 1990;587:218-39. · DOI
  12. Hajjar DP, Pomerantz B. Signal transduction in atherosclerosis: integration of cytokines and the eicosanoid network. FASEBB 1992;6:2933-41. · DOI
  13. Fleet JC, Clinton SK, Salomom RN, Loppnow H, Libby P. Atherogenic diets enhance endotoxin-stimulated interleukin-l and tumour necrosis factor gene expression in rabbit aortae. JNutr 1992;122:294-305.
  14. Mulroney HM, Grimble RF. Influence of butter and of com, coconut and fishoils on the effects of recombinant human tumour necrosis factor-a in rats. Clin Sci 1993;84:105-12. · DOI
  15. Troughton KL, Grimble RF. Vitamin E status modulates the inflammatory response to endotoxin in rats [abstract]. Proc Nutr Soc 1993;52:84A.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Margetts, B. M., & Jackson, A. A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1993-11-27
Volume
307
Issue
6916
Pages
1381-1384
ISSN
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
Cited by
149
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.