Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation

Open access
Andersson, R, Hugander, A, Thulin, A, Nystrom, P O, Olaison, G·1994·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To clarify poorly understood epidemiological features of appendicitis. Design : Retrospective study of consecutive cases from a defined population and analysis of data from published studies. Setting : County of Jonkoping, Sweden. 3029 patients who underwent operation in 1984-9 and 4717 patients from the county town who underwent operation in 1970-89, all for suspected appendicitis, plus 48 426 cases from six reported studies. Main outcome measures : Incidences specific for age and sex and temporal trends of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis and removal of a normal appendix. Associations between diagnostic accuracy, rate of perforation, and incidences of removal of a normal appendix and of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis. Results : The incidence of appendicitis was 116/100 000 inhabitants. Appendicitis was more common in male patients. The incidence of perforating appendicitis was independent of age, stable overtime, and uninfluenced by the rate of laparotomy, whereas the incidence of non-perforating appendicitis was age dependent, decreasing over time, and related to the diagnostic accuracy and rate of removal of a normal appendix. Conclusions : Perforating and non-perforating appendicitis seem to be separate entities, and appendicitis that resolves spontaneously is common. This may have important implications for managing suspected appendicitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Andersson, R., Hugander, A., Thulin, A., Nystrom, P. O., & Olaison, G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1994-01-08
Volume
308
Issue
6921
Pages
107-110
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2082281561
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.308.6921.107
The paper
Andersson, R., Hugander, A., Thulin, A., Nystrom, P. O., & Olaison, G. (1994). Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6921.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.