The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To determine (i) risk factors in the development of third degree obstetric tears and (ii) the success of primary sphincter repair. Design (i) Retrospective analysis of obstetric variables in 50 women who had sustained a third degree tear, compared with the remaining 8553 vaginal deliveries during the same period. (ii) Women who had sustained a third degree tear and had primary sphincter repair and control subjects were interviewed and investigated with anal endosonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements Setting : Antenatal clinic in teaching hospital in inner London. Subjects (i) All women (n=8603) who delivered vaginally over a 31 month period. (ii) 34 women who sustained a third degree tear and 88 matched controls. Main outcome measures : Obstetric risk factors, defaecatory symptoms, sonographic sphincter defects, and pudendal nerve damage. Results - (i) Factors significantly associated with development of a third degree tear were: forceps delivery (50% v 7% in controls; P=0.00001), primiparous delivery (85% v 43%; P=0.00001), birth weight >4 kg (P=0.00002), and occipitoposterior position at delivery (P=0.003). No third degree tear occurred during 351 vacuum extractions. Eleven of 25 (44%) women who were delivered without instruments and had a third degree tear did so despite a posterolateral episiotomy. (ii) Anal incontinence or faecal urgency was present in 16 women with tears and 11 controls (47% v 13%;20P=0.00001). Sonographic sphincter defects were identified in 29 with tears and 29 controls (85% v 33%; P=0.00001). Every symptomatic patient had persistent combined internal and external sphincter defects, and these were associated with significantly lower anal pressures. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements were not significantly different. Conclusions Vacuum, extraction is associated with fewer third degree tears than forceps delivery. An episiotomy does not always prevent a third degree tear. Primary repair is inadequate in most women who sustain third degree tears, most having residual sphincter defects and about half experiencing anal incontinence, which is caused by persistent mechanical sphincter disruption rather than pudendal nerve damage. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and surgical techniques of repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wexner, S. D., Coller, J. A., Devroede, G., Hull, T., McCallum, R., Chan, M., Ayscue, J. M., Shobeiri, A. S., Margolin, D., England, M., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cf8ed0 · Cited by 351
Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term
Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G. J., Neilson, J. P., Kingdon, C., & Gyte, G. M. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004660.pub3 · Cited by 78
Fecal incontinence in the elderly patient
Tariq, S. H., Morley, J. E., & Prather, C. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00327-9 · Cited by 49
Fishing for (in)continence: long-term follow-up of women with OASIS–still a taboo
Schütze, S., Hohlfeld, B., Friedl, T. W. P., Otto, S., Kraft, K., Hancke, K., Hüner, B., Janni, W., & Deniz, M. (2021) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05878-8 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., Hudson, C. N., & Bartram, C. I.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-04-02
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 6933
- Pages
- 887-891
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2023315209
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887
- The paper
- Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., Hudson, C. N., & Bartram, C. I. (1994). Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.