The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deep venous thrombosis and occult malignancy: an epidemiological study
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To determine the risk of subsequent cancer in patients with deep venous thrombosis confirmed by venography. Design : Follow up of all patients who had venography for suspected deep venous thrombosis during 1984-88. Patients were traced through a cancer registry up to 1 January 1991. Subjects : 4399 patients who had phlebography in one hospital. Setting - General hospital in Malmo, Sweden, serving a population of 230 000. Main outcome measure : Number of cancers recorded. Results : 4399 patients had venography for suspected deep venous thrombosis; 604 were known to have a malignancy at the time of venography and were excluded from further analysis. 1383 had deep venous thrombosis, 150 of whom subsequently developed cancer. 182 of the 2412 patients without thrombosis developed cancer. During the first six months after venography 66 patients with thrombosis developed malignancy compared with 37 patients without thrombosis (P<0.0001). 38 of the cancers in the deep venous thrombosis group were detected by history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Three patients had postoperative or post-traumatic deep venous thromboses. Only two of the remaining patients would have benefited from early detection by extensive screening. After six months the incidence of cancer was identical in patients with and without thrombosis. Conclusion : Deep venous thrombosis is associated with a significantly higher frequency of malignancy during the first six months after diagnosis. Malignancies can be found with simple clinical and diagnostic methods and extensive screening is not required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis
Blom, J. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.6.715 · Cited by 1,949
Prognosis of Cancers Associated with Venous Thromboembolism
Sørensen, H. T., Mellemkjær, L., Olsen, J. H., & Baron, J. A. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200012213432504 · Cited by 1,628
Levitan, N., Dowlati, A., Remick, S. C., Tahsildar, H. I., Sivinski, L. D., Beyth, R., & Rimm, A. A. (1999) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/00005792-199909000-00001 · Cited by 891
The Hypercoagulable State of Malignancy: Pathogenesis and Current Debate
Caine, G. J., Stonelake, P. S., Lip, G. Y. H., & Kehoe, S. T. (2002) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900263 · Cited by 576
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism
Heit, J. A. (2003) · Clinics in Chest Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0272-5231(02)00077-1 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordstrom, M., Lindblad, B., Anderson, H., Bergqvist, D., & Kjellstrom, T.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-04-02
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 6933
- Pages
- 891-894
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2057586524
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep venous thrombosis and occult malignancy: an epidemiological study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.308.6933.891
- The paper
- Nordstrom, M., Lindblad, B., Anderson, H., Bergqvist, D., & Kjellstrom, T. (1994). Deep venous thrombosis and occult malignancy: an epidemiological study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6933.891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.