Cited by 359Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and BurnoutMental Health Treatment and Access

Stress, anxiety, and depression in hospital consultants, general practitioners, and senior health service managers

Open access
Caplan, R P·1994·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To study stress anxiety, and depression in a group of senior health service staff. Design : Postsal survey. Subjects : 81 hospital consultants, 322 general practitioners, and 121 senior hospital managers (total 524). Main outcome measures : Scores on the general health questionnaire and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Results : Sixty five (80%) consultants, 257 (80%) general practitioners, and 67 (56%) managers replied. Of all 389 subjects, 183 (47%) scored positively on the general health questionnaire, indicating high levels of stress. From scores on the hospital anxiety and depression scale only 178 (46%) would be regarded as free from anxiety, with 100 (25%) scoring as borderline cases and 111 (29%) likely to be experiencing clinically measurable symptoms. The findigns for depression were also of some concern, especially for general practitioners, with 69 (27%) scoring as borderline or likely to be depressed. General practitioners were more likely to be depressed than managers (69 (27%) v 4 (6%) scored >=8 on hospital anxiety and depression sacle-D; P=0.004) with no sgnificant difference between general practitioners and consultants. General practitioners were significantly more likely to show suicidal thanking than were consultants (36 (14%) v 3 (5%); P=0.04) but not managers (9 (13%)). No significant differnce could be found between the three groups on any other measure. Conclusions : the levels of stress, anxiety, and depressionin senior doctors and managers in the NHS seem to be high and perhaps higher than expected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1261

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caplan, R. P.
Affiliations
Lincoln County Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Caplan, R P
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1994-11-12
Volume
309
Issue
6964
Pages
1261-1263
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2040665300
Cited by
359
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
46.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rockefeller Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
occupational stress, anxiety, depression, hospital consultants, general practitioners, hospital administrators, health managers, suicidal ideation, mental health of healthcare workers, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Consultants, Depression, United Kingdom, Hospital Administrators, Humans, Medical Staff, Hospital, Physicians, Family, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review