The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To evaluate the ability of doctors in primary care to assess risk patients' risk of coronary heart disease. Design : Questionnaire survey. Setting : Continuing medical education meetings, Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Subjects : Community based doctors who agreed to enrol in the coronary health assessment study. Main outcome measure : Ratings of coronary risk factors and estimates by doctors of relative and absolute coronary risk of two hypothetical patients and the “average” 40 year old Canadian man and 70 year old Canadian woman. Results : 253 doctors answered the questionnaire. For 30 year olds the doctors rated cigarette smoking as the most important risk factor and raised serum triglyceride concentrations as the least important; for 70 year old patients they rated diabetes as the most important risk factor and raised serum triglyceride concentrations as the least important. They rated each individual risk factor as significantly less important for 70 year olds than for 30 year olds (all risk factors, P<0.001). They showed a strong understanding of the relative importance of specific risk factors, and most were confident in their ability to estimate coronary risk. While doctors accurately estimated the relative risk of a specific patient (compared with the average adult) they systematically overestimated the absolute baseline risk of developing coronary disease and the risk reductions associated with specific interventions. Conclusions : Despite guidelines on targeting patients at high risk of coronary disease accurate assessment of coronary risk remains difficult for many doctors. Additional strategies must be developed to help doctors to assess better their patients' coronary risk. Key messages: Key messages This study shows that doctors in primary care accurately assess the relative risk of coronary disease in individual patients They systematically overestimate, however, the absolute risk of coronary disease in individual patients Doctors in primary care also overestimate the absolute benefits of modification of coronary risk factors including lowering lipid concentration, control of blood pressure, and stopping smoking Additional strategies must be found to improve the skills in risk assessment among doctors in primary care to support their clinical decision making in individual patients
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hypercholesterolemia: The current educational needs of physicians
McBride, P. E., Plane, M. B., & Underbakke, G. (1992) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(92)90535-4 · Cited by 20
Cited by
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension
McEvoy, J. W., McCarthy, C. P., Bruno, R. M., Brouwers, S., Canavan, M. D., Ceconi, C., Christodorescu, R. M., Daskalopoulou, S. S., Ferro, C. J., Gerdts, E., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae178 · Cited by 2,298
Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: Basic Concepts, Current Status, and Future Directions
Lloyd-Jones, D. M. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.849166 · Cited by 705
Furukawa, T. A., Guyatt, G. H., & Griffith, L. E. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.72 · Cited by 318
Sheridan, S., Pignone, M., & Mulrow, C. (2003) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30107.x · Cited by 178
Thomsen, T. F., Davidsen, M., Ibsen, H., Jorgensen, T., Jensen, G., & Borch-Johnsen, K. (2001) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/174182670100800508 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Grover, S. A., Lowensteyn, I., Esrey, K. L., Steinert, Y., Joseph, L., & Abrahamowicz, M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-04-15
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 6985
- Pages
- 975-978
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2085136351
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.310.6985.975
- The paper
- Grover, S. A., Lowensteyn, I., Esrey, K. L., Steinert, Y., Joseph, L., & Abrahamowicz, M. (1995). Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6985.975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.