The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of young Danish twins
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the genetic contribution to the aetiology of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Historical cohort study of twins, with information on diabetes being gathered by questionnaire, verification of the diagnosis by the subject's diabetologist or general practitioner, and clinical examination in available twins. SETTING: Danish twin register and diabetic clinics and general practices throughout Denmark. SUBJECTS: 20,888 twin pairs born during 1953-82, included in a population based nationwide register. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and cumulative concordance rates and heritability in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. RESULTS: The crude probandwise concordance rate was 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.73) for monozygotic twin pairs and 0.11 (0.05 to 0.21) for dizygotic twin pairs. When adjusted for age at onset of diabetes and age at last observation among unaffected twin partners the cumulative proband-wise risk from birth to age 35 was estimated as 0.70 (0.45 to 0.95) for monozygotic twins and 0.13 (0.05 to 0.20) for dizygotic twins. The correlations of liability for monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs were estimated as 0.96 (SE 0.09) and 0.58 (0.07), with a heritability estimate of 0.72 (0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of insulin dependent diabetes in monozygotic twins is higher than previously thought and for dizygotic twins is higher than in ordinary first degree relatives. Based on the findings of this study the genetic component to the disease seems more important than hitherto believed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug Dependence, a Chronic Medical Illness
McLellan, A. T., Lewis, D. C., O'Brien, C. P., & Kleber, H. D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.13.1689 · Cited by 2,622
The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity
Wu, H.-J., & Wu, E. (2012) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.19320 · Cited by 1,426
Type 1 Diabetes: Etiology, Immunology, and Therapeutic Strategies
Van Belle, T. L., Coppieters, K. T., & Von Herrath, M. G. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2010 · Cited by 1,022
Variation and trends in incidence of childhood diabetes in Europe
(2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)07125-1 · Cited by 755
The genetics of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: dissecting psychosis
Craddock, N., O’Donovan, M. C., & Owen, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.030718 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Kyvik, K. O., Green, A., & Beck-Nielsen, H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-10-07
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 7010
- Pages
- 913-917
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2017695531
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of young Danish twins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.311.7010.913
- The paper
- Kyvik, K. O., Green, A., & Beck-Nielsen, H. (1995). Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of young Danish twins. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7010.913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.