The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Health effects of anticipation of job change and non-employment: longitudinal data from the Whitehall II study
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To assess the effect of anticipating job change or non-employment on self reported health status in a group of middle aged male and female white collar civil servants. Design : Longitudinal cohort study (Whitehall II study). Questionnaire data on self reported health status and health behaviour were obtained at initial screening and four years later, during the period when employees of the department facing privatisation were anticipating job change or job loss. Setting : London based office staff in 20 civil service departments. Subjects : 666 members of one department threatened with early privatisation were compared with members of the 19 other departments. Main outcome measures : Self reported health status measures and health related behaviours, before and during anticipation of privatisation. Results : In comparison to the remainder of the cohort, the profile of health related behaviours of cohort members who faced privatisation was more favourable, both before and during anticipation of privatisation. There were no significant differences in the changes in health behaviours between cohort members moving into a period of job insecurity and the remainder of the cohort. Self reported health status, however, tended to deteriorate among employees anticipating privatisation when compared with that of the rest of the cohort. Conclusions : The application of a longitudinal design, allowing the same individuals to be followed from job security into anticipation, provides more robust evidence than has previously been available that anticipation of job loss affects health even before employment status has changed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.
Bosma, H., Peter, R., Siegrist, J., & Marmot, M. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.68 · Cited by 831
Self-citationBennett, J. M., Reeves, G., Billman, G. E., & Sturmberg, J. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00316 · Cited by 531
Everson, S. A., Lynch, J. W., Chesney, M. A., Kaplan, G. A., Goldberg, D. E., Shade, S. B., Cohen, R. D., Salonen, R., & Salonen, J. T. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.553 · Cited by 232
Climate Change and Occupational Safety and Health: Establishing a Preliminary Framework
Schulte, P. A., & Chun, H. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620903066008 · Cited by 206
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Among Farmers: The HUNT Study, Norway
Torske, M. O., Hilt, B., Glasscock, D., Lundqvist, P., & Krokstad, S. (2016) · Journal of Agromedicine · doi:10.1080/1059924x.2015.1106375 · Cited by 96
Symptoms of depression and all-cause mortality in farmers, a cohort study: the HUNT study, Norway
Letnes, J. M., Torske, M. O., Hilt, B., Bjørngaard, J. H., & Krokstad, S. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010783 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrie, J. E., Shipley, M. J., Marmot, M. G., Stansfeld, S., & Smith, G. D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-11-11
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 7015
- Pages
- 1264-1269
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1995984607
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.