Cited by 232Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionWorkplace Health and Well-beingBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Interaction of workplace demands and cardiovascular reactivity in progression of carotid atherosclerosis: population based study

Open access
Everson, Susan A, Lynch, John W, Chesney, Margaret A, Kaplan, George A, Goldberg, Debbie E, Shade, Starley B, Cohen, Richard D, Salonen, Riitta +1 more·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To examine the combined influence of workplace demands and changes in blood pressure induced by stress on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Design: Population based follow up study of unestablished as well as traditional risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis, ischaemic heart disease, and other outcomes. Setting: Eastern Finland. Subjects: 591 men aged 42-60 who were fully employed at baseline and had complete data on the measures of carotid atherosclerosis, job demands, blood pressure reactivity, and covariates. Main outcome measures: Change in ultrasonographically assessed intima-media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries from baseline to 4 year follow up. Results: Significant interactions between workplace demands and stress induced reactivity were observed for all measures of progression (P<0.04). Men with large changes in systolic blood pressure (20 mm Hg or greater) in anticipation of a maximal exercise test and with high job demands had 10-40% greater progression of mean (0.138 v 0.123 mm) and maximum (0.320 v 0.261 mm) intima-media thickness and plaque height (0.347 v 0.264) than men who were less reactive and had fewer job demands. Similar results were obtained after excluding men with prevalent ischaemic heart disease at baseline. Findings were strongest among men with at least 20% stenosis or non-stenotic plaque at baseline. In this subgroup reactive men with high job demands had more than 46% greater atherosclerotic progression than the others. Adjustment for atherosclerotic risk factors did not alter the results. Conclusions: Men who showed stress induced blood pressure reactivity and who reported high job demands experienced the greatest atherosclerotic progression, showing the association between dispositional risk characteristics and contextual determinants of disease and suggesting that behaviourally evoked cardiovascular reactivity may have a role in atherogenesis. Key messages: Psychological stress plays an important part in the illness and premature death associated with cardiovascular disease, but individual susceptibility to disease varies according to biological predispositions, personality, behaviour, and environmental exposures This study found that a demanding work environment in combination with a predisposition to exaggerated blood pressure reactivity to stress was significantly related to progression of carotid atherosclerosis over four years among employed middle aged men and was independent of known atherosclerotic risk factors These findings support the role of stress induced reactivity in human atherogenesis Future research needs to confirm these findings in other populations and to examine the influence of other risk factors and environments on the progression of disease

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.553

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Everson, S. A., Lynch, J. W., Chesney, M. A., Kaplan, G. A., Goldberg, D. E., Shade, S. B., Cohen, R. D., Salonen, R., & Salonen, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Human Population Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-02-22
Volume
314
Issue
7080
Pages
553
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2007497220
Cited by
232
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (HS06516)
  • University of Dundee
  • British Heart Foundation (HS06516)
  • Health and Safety Executive
  • Academy of Finland
  • Medical Research Council (HS06516)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-44199, HS06516, HL36310, R01HL044199)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
carotid atherosclerosis, atherosclerosis progression, job demands, occupational stress, blood pressure reactivity, cardiovascular reactivity, intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, middle-aged men, ischemic heart disease, atherogenesis, psychological stress, risk factor interactions, blood pressure response to exercise, carotid artery stenosis, Eastern Finland
MeSH terms
Adult, Arteriosclerosis, Blood Pressure, Carotid Artery Diseases, Exercise Test, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Stress, Psychological, Carotid Stenosis, Workplace, Myocardial Ischemia, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review