Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ratio of waist circumference to height is strong predictor of intra-abdominal fat: Fig 1

Open access
Ashwell, Margaret, Cole, Timothy J, Dixon, Adrian K·1996·BMJ

Abstract

necessary.A national waiting list policy that guarantees access according to agreed criteria, rather than simply guaranteeing maximum wait- ing times, could facilitate contracts between pur- chasers and providers on the basis of agreed criteria for the prioritisation of waiting lists.Points could be assigned to patients by consultants to reflect, for example, current health status, assessed using the EuroQoL or SF36 health status measures; expected gain in quality of adjusted life years (QALY)3 from treatment; or some combination of clinical factors such as rate of deterioration and social factors reflecting dysfunction in usual activities.This is being pursued by New Zealand's Health Commission4 and in the United Kingdom is being piloted at Salisbury District Hospital.5Points schemes could help establish thresholds for entry on to elective waiting lists and help standardise general practitioners' referral prac- tice for routine procedures.If rationing in the NHS is inevitable, waiting list points schemes could help to ensure that patients with similar need, somehow reflected by their points allocation, could be assured of simi- lar access to treatment, regardless of clinical specialty, geographical location, or general practitioner's status.Points schemes could provide a redefinition of the principle on which the NHS was founded within the constraints of resource limitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.559d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ashwell, M., Cole, T. J., & Dixon, A. K.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-08-31
Volume
313
Issue
7056
Pages
559.5-560
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2042903401
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.