Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 911

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study

Open access
Hole, D J, Watt, G C M, Davey-Smith, G, Hart, C L, Gillis, C R, Hawthorne, V M·1996·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To assess the relation between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and subsequent mortality. Design : Prospective general population study. Setting : Renfrew and Paisley, Scotland. Subjects : 7058 men and 8353 women aged 45-64 years at baseline screening in 1972-6. Main outcome measure : Mortality from all causes, ischaemic heart disease, cancer, lung and other cancers, stroke, respiratory disease, and other causes of death after 15 years of follow up. Results : 2545 men and 1894 women died during the follow up period. Significant trends of increasing risk with diminishing FEV1 are apparent for both sexes for all the causes of death examined after adjustment for age, cigarette smoking, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol concentration, body mass index, and social class. The relative hazard ratios for all cause mortality for subjects in the lowest fifth of the FEV1 distribution were 1.92 (95% confidence interval 1.68 to 2.20) for men and 1.89 (1.63 to 2.20) for women. Corresponding relative hazard ratios were 1.56 (1.26 to 1.92) and 1.88 (1.44 to 2.47) for ischaemic heart disease, 2.53 (1.69 to 3.79) and 4.37 (1.84 to 10.42) for lung cancer, and 1.66 (1.07 to 2.59) and 1.65 (1.09 to 2.49) for stroke. Reduced FEV1 was also associated with an increased risk for each cause of death examined except cancer for lifelong nonsmokers. Conclusions : Impaired lung function is a major clinical indicator of mortality risk in men and women for a wide range of diseases. The use of FEV1 as part of any health assessment of middle aged patients should be considered. Smokers with reduced FEV1 should form a priority group for targeted advice to stop smoking. Key messages: These increased risks, with the exception of the cancers, are apparent for lifelong non-smokers FEV1 is second in importance to cigarette smoking as a predictor of subsequent all cause mortality and is as important as cholesterol in predicting mortality from ischaemic heart disease FEV1 should be included in health assessment of middle aged men and women Smokers with a reduced FEV1 should be targeted with advice to stop smoking

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.711

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 911

Metadata

Authors
Hole, D. J., Watt, G. C. M., Davey-Smith, G., Hart, C. L., Gillis, C. R., & Hawthorne, V. M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-09-21
Volume
313
Issue
7059
Pages
711-715
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2168315832
Cited by
911
References
1
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.313.7059.711
The paper
Hole, D. J., Watt, G. C. M., Davey-Smith, G., Hart, C. L., Gillis, C. R., & Hawthorne, V. M. (1996). Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7059.711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.