Cited by 1,440Air Quality and Health ImpactsAsthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age

Open access
Gauderman, W. James, Avol, Edward, Gilliland, Frank, Vora, Hita, Thomas, Duncan, Berhane, Kiros, McConnell, Rob, Kuenzli, Nino +5 more·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether exposure to air pollution adversely affects the growth of lung function during the period of rapid lung development that occurs between the ages of 10 and 18 years is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective study, we recruited 1759 children (average age, 10 years) from schools in 12 southern California communities and measured lung function annually for eight years. The rate of attrition was approximately 10 percent per year. The communities represented a wide range of ambient exposures to ozone, acid vapor, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship of air pollution to the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and other spirometric measures. RESULTS: Over the eight-year period, deficits in the growth of FEV(1) were associated with exposure to nitrogen dioxide (P=0.005), acid vapor (P=0.004), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 microm (PM(2.5)) (P=0.04), and elemental carbon (P=0.007), even after adjustment for several potential confounders and effect modifiers. Associations were also observed for other spirometric measures. Exposure to pollutants was associated with clinically and statistically significant deficits in the FEV(1) attained at the age of 18 years. For example, the estimated proportion of 18-year-old subjects with a low FEV(1) (defined as a ratio of observed to expected FEV(1) of less than 80 percent) was 4.9 times as great at the highest level of exposure to PM(2.5) as at the lowest level of exposure (7.9 percent vs. 1.6 percent, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that current levels of air pollution have chronic, adverse effects on lung development in children from the age of 10 to 18 years, leading to clinically significant deficits in attained FEV(1) as children reach adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa040610

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term exposures to ozone have been associated with lower lung function and deteriorated or abnormal lung development in children.

    “Long-term exposures to ozone have been associated with lower lung function and deteriorated or abnormal lung development in children (31, 32).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauderman, W. J., Avol, E., Gilliland, F., Vora, H., Thomas, D., Berhane, K., McConnell, R., Kuenzli, N., Lurmann, F., Rappaport, E., Margolis, H., Bates, D., & Peters, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (W.J.G., E.A., F.G., H.V., D.T., K.B., R.M., N.K., E.R., J.P.); Sonoma Technology, Petaluma, Calif. (F.L.); Air Resources Board, State of California, Sacramento (H.M.); and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (D.B.).
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-09-09
Volume
351
Issue
11
Pages
1057-1067
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2154704691
Cited by
1,440
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 79
FWCI
46.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (1 P01 ES11627, 5P30-ES07048, P01ES011627, P30ES007048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
air pollution, lung development, lung function, FEV1, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, PM2.5, ozone, elemental carbon, children's exposure, adolescent growth, long-term exposure, spirometry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, California, Child, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Lung, Male, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Nitrogen Dioxide, Ozone, Particle Size, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, Spirometry, Vital Capacity, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review