The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of colour of drugs: systematic review of perceived effect of drugs and of their effectiveness
Open accessAbstract
Objectives : To assess the impact of the colour of a drug's formulation on its perceived effect and its effectiveness and to examine whether antidepressant drugs available in the Netherlands are different in colour from hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs. Design : Systematic review of 12 published studies. Six studies examined the perceived action of different coloured drugs and six the influence of the colour of a drug on its effectiveness. The colours of samples of 49 drugs affecting the central nervous system were assessed using a colour atlas. Main outcome measures : Perceived stimulant action versus perceived depressant action of colour of drugs; the trials that assessed the effect of drugs in different colours were done in patients with different diseases and had different outcome measures. Results : The studies on perceived action of coloured drugs showed that red, yellow, and orange are associated with a stimulant effect, while blue and green are related to a tranquillising effect. The trials that assessed the impact of the colour of drugs on their effectiveness showed inconsistent differences between colours. The quality of the methods of these trials was variable. Hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs were more likely than antidepressants to be green, blue, or purple. Conclusion : Colours affect the perceived action of a drug and seem to influence the effectiveness of a drug. Moreover, a relation exists between the colouring of drugs that affect the central nervous system and the indications for which they are used. Research contributing to a better understanding of the effect of the colour of drugs is warranted. Key messages: The colour of a drug seems to influence its effectiveness, but consistent trends are not apparent Hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs avail- able in the Netherlands are more likely than antidepressants to be green, blue, or purple Research contributing to a better understanding of the effect of the colour of drugs is warranted
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon
Barsky, A. J. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.5.622 · Cited by 784
Does food color influence taste and flavor perception in humans?
Spence, C., Levitan, C. A., Shankar, M. U., & Zampini, M. (2010) · Chemosensory Perception · doi:10.1007/s12078-010-9067-z · Cited by 540
Hartogsohn, I. (2016) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881116677852 · Cited by 483
Placebo psychotherapy: Synonym or oxymoron?
Kirsch, I. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20126 · Cited by 164
Why use placebos in clinical trials? A narrative review of the methodological literature
Vickers, A. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00139-0 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- de Craen, A. J. M., Roos, P. J., de Vries, A. L., & Kleijnen, J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-12-21
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 7072
- Pages
- 1624-1626
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1979914314
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of colour of drugs: systematic review of perceived effect of drugs and of their effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.313.7072.1624
- The paper
- de Craen, A. J. M., Roos, P. J., de Vries, A. L., & Kleijnen, J. (1996). Effect of colour of drugs: systematic review of perceived effect of drugs and of their effectiveness. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7072.1624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
