Cited by 121Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPain Management and Placebo EffectAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Why use placebos in clinical trials? A narrative review of the methodological literature

Vickers, A·2000·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Researchers have a number of different options for their choice of control or comparison intervention in randomized trials. We surveyed the methodological literature looking for reasons why a researcher might choose to administer a placebo (i.e., a mimic intervention) to control subjects. Two implicit assumptions were that the issue of placebo is pertinent only to drug trials and that the nonplacebo effect of a treatment is the "real" or "true" effect. Explicit reasons given in the literature for the use of placebos were facilitating blinding and controlling for the placebo effect. The importance of the latter was often inadequately argued. Reasons to avoid placebos in controlled trials, other than ethics and feasibility, are that placebos do not inform real decisions, and may interfere with accurate estimation of effect size and with nonspecific aspects of treatment. Placebo-controlled trials have high internal validity but may be difficult to apply to clinical practice; the situation is reversed for trials without placebo control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00139-0

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vickers, A.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Vickers, A
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
157-161
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990079090
Cited by
121
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
placebo effect, blinding, internal validity, effect size estimation, treatment generalizability, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Humans, Placebos, Epidemiologic Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review