The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open randomised trial of prescribing strategies in managing sore throat
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess three prescribing strategies for sore throat. Design: Randomised follow up study. Setting: 11 general practices in the South and West region. Subjects: 716 patients aged 4 years and over with sore throat and an abnormal physical sign in the throat; 84% had tonsillitis or pharyngitis. Patients were randomised to three groups: prescription for antibiotics for 10 days (group 1, 246 patients); no prescription (group 2, 230 patients); or prescription for antibiotics if symptoms were not starting to settle after three days (group 3; 238 patients). Main outcome measures: Duration of symptoms; satisfaction and compliance with and perceived efficacy of antibiotics; time off school or work. Outcomes were documented in 582 subjects (81%). Results: Median duration of antibiotic use differed significantly in the three groups (10 v 0 v 0 days, P<0.001); 69% of patients in group 3 did not use their prescription. The proportion of patients better by day 3 did not differ significantly (37% v 35% v 30%, P=0.28), nor did the duration of illness (median 4 v 5 v 5 days, P=0.39), days off work or school (median 2 v 2 v 1, P=0.13), or proportion of patients satisfied (96% v 90% v 93%, P=0.09), although group 1 had fewer days of fever (median 1 v 2 v 2 days, P=0.04). More patients in group 1 thought the antibiotics were effective (87% v 55% v 60%, P<0.001) and intended coming to the doctor in future attacks (79% v 54% v 57%, P<0.001). “Legitimation” of illness—to explain to work or school (60%) or family or friends (37%)–was an important reason for consultation. Patients who were more satisfied got better more quickly, and satisfaction related strongly to how well the doctor dealt with patient's concerns. Conclusion: Prescribing antibiotics for sore throat only marginally affects the resolution of symptoms but enhances belief in antibiotics and intention to consult in future when compared with the acceptable strategies of no prescription or delayed prescription. Psychosocial factors are important in the decision to see a general practitioner and in predicting the duration of illness. Key messages: Sore throat is one of the commonest presentations of upper respiratory illness to general practitioners, and attendance is increasing Prescribing antibiotics for sore throat does not reduce the extent and duration of symptoms Prescribing antibiotics enhances belief in antibiotics and intention to consult Legitimation of illness is an important reason for attending the doctor Satisfaction predicts duration of illness and closely relates to how well concerns are dealt with—unless patients are very ill, general practitioners should consider exploring concerns and should avoid or delay prescribing antibiotics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.
(1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4,085
Psychological Stress and Susceptibility to the Common Cold
Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108293250903 · Cited by 1,712
The Diagnosis of Strep Throat in Adults in the Emergency Room
Centor, R. M., Witherspoon, J. M., Dalton, H. P., Brody, C. E., & Link, K. (1981) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x8100100304 · Cited by 763
Arason, V. A., Kristinsson, K. G., Sigurdsson, J. A., Stefansdottir, G., Molstad, S., & Gudmundsson, S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7054.387 · Cited by 492
General practice consultations: is there any point in being positive?
Thomas, K. B. (1987) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1200 · Cited by 419
Kaplan, E. L., Top, F. H., Dudding, B. A., & Wannamaker, L. W. (1971) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/123.5.490 · Cited by 346
Froom, J., Culpepper, L., Grob, P., Bartelds, A., Bowers, P., Bridges-Webb, C., Grava-Gubins, I., Green, L., Lion, J., & Somaini, B. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6724.582 · Cited by 249
Siegel, A. C., Johnson, E. E., & Stollerman, G. H. (1961) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196109212651201 · Cited by 221
A Simple Scorecard for the Tentative Diagnosis of Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Breese, B. B. (1977) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.1977.02120180028003 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke after Acute Infection or Vaccination
Smeeth, L., Thomas, S. L., Hall, A. J., Hubbard, R., Farrington, P., & Vallance, P. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041747 · Cited by 1,375
Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., & Payne, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7318.908 · Cited by 906
Self-citationLittle, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., & Payne, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.468 · Cited by 766
Self-citationProcalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections
Schuetz, P., Wirz, Y., Sager, R., Christ-Crain, M., Stolz, D., Tamm, M., Bouadma, L., Luyt, C. E., Wolff, M., Chastre, J., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007498.pub3 · Cited by 649
Risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after acute infection in a community setting
Smeeth, L., Cook, C., Thomas, S., Hall, A. J., Hubbard, R., & Vallance, P. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68474-2 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, P., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Gould, C., Gantley, M., & Kinmonth, A. L.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-03-08
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 7082
- Pages
- 722
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1963994823
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open randomised trial of prescribing strategies in managing sore throat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.314.7082.722
- The paper
- Little, P., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Gould, C., Gantley, M., & Kinmonth, A. L. (1997). Open randomised trial of prescribing strategies in managing sore throat. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7082.722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.