Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study

Open access
Winters, Jan C, Sobel, Jan S, Groenier, Klaas H, Arendzen, Hans J, Jong, Betty Meyboom-de·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating patients with shoulder complaints in general practice. Design: Randomised, single blind study. Setting: Seven general practices in the Netherlands. Subjects: 198 patients with shoulder complaints, of whom 172 were divided, on the basis of physical examination, into two diagnostic groups: a shoulder girdle group (n = 58) and a synovial group (n = 114). Interventions: Patients in the shoulder girdle group were randomised to manipulation or physiotherapy, and patients in the synovial group were randomised to corticosteroid injection, manipulation, or physiotherapy. Main outcome measures: Duration of shoulder complaints analysed by survival analysis. Results: In the shoulder girdle group duration of complaints was significantly shorter after manipulation compared with physiotherapy (P < 0.001). Also the number of patients reporting treatment failure was less with manipulation. In the synovial group duration of complaints was shortest after corticosteroid injection compared with manipulation and physiotherapy (P < 0.001). Drop out due to treatment failure was low in the injection group (17%) and high in the manipulation group (59%) and physiotherapy group (51%). Conclusions: For treating shoulder girdle disorders, manipulation seems to be the preferred treatment. For the synovial disorders, corticosteroid injection seems the best treatment. Key messages: Many patients with shoulder complaints are treated in general practice, but there has been little evaluation of different treatments In this single blind randomised trial we investigated the effect of corticosteroid injection, manipulation, and physiotherapy on the duration of shoulder complaints among patients treated in general practice Patients were divided into two diagnostic groups: those with complaints originating from the synovial structures and those whose complaints originated from the shoulder girdle The first group was treated by injection, manipulation, or physiotherapy: those receiving injection showed quickest recovery and only 17% of patients dropped out because of treatment failure, compared with 51% in physiotherapy group and 59% in manipulation group Patients with a shoulder girdle disorder were treated by manipulation or physiotherapy: duration of complaints was significantly shorter after manipulation, and there was only 20% drop out in this group compared with 45% in physiotherapy group

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1320

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Winters, J. C., Sobel, J. S., Groenier, K. H., Arendzen, H. J., & Jong, B. M.-D.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-05-03
Volume
314
Issue
7090
Pages
1320
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1983048735
Cited by
242
References
0
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1320
The paper
Winters, J. C., Sobel, J. S., Groenier, K. H., Arendzen, H. J., & Jong, B. M.-D. (1997). Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1320

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.