The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders
Abstract
Shoulder complaints are common and have an unfavourable outcome in many patients. Only 50% of all new episodes of shoulder disorders end in complete recovery within 6 months. There is no consensus about prognostic indicators that can identify patients at high and low risk of chronicity. By a systematic search of the literature we identified 16 studies focusing on the prognosis of shoulder disorders. The methodological quality of these 16 studies was assessed. Six of these were considered to be of relatively 'high quality'. There was a wide variety among the studies in length of follow-up, study population, evaluated prognostic factors, type of outcome measure and method of analysis. Due to this large heterogeneity, we refrained from statistical pooling. Instead, we used a best-evidence synthesis. There is strong evidence that high pain intensity predicts a poorer outcome in primary care populations and that middle age (45-54) is associated with poor outcome in occupational populations. There is moderate evidence that a long duration of complaints, and high disability score at baseline predict a poorer outcome in primary care. These results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small number of studies on which these conclusions are based, and the large heterogeneity among studies regarding follow-up, outcome measures, and analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S. D., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,668
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109 · cited 1×
“The addition of non-journal publications has been shown to move the effect estimates towards a null result (Burdett et al., 2003; Easterbrook et al., 1991).”
BackgroundPincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017 · Cited by 1,633
Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review
Luime, J., Koes, B., Hendriksen, I., Burdorf, A., Verhagen, A., Miedema, H., & Verhaar, J. (2004) · Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.1080/03009740310004667 · Cited by 1,347
Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study
Picavet, H. S. J., & Schouten, J. S. A. G. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x · Cited by 1,197 · cited 2×
“There is no consensus about prognostic indicators that can identify patients at high and low risk of chronicity.”
BackgroundLanguage bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German
Egger, M., Zellweger-Zähner, T., Schneider, M., Junker, C., Lengeler, C., & Antes, G. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02419-7 · Cited by 1,028
Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management.
van der Windt, D. A., Koes, B. W., de Jong, B. A., & Bouter, L. M. (1995) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.54.12.959 · Cited by 963
Self-citationDeveloping Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE
Haynes, R. B., Wilczynski, N., McKibbon, K. A., Walker, C. J., & Sinclair, J. C. (1994) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434 · Cited by 765
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · Cited by 756
Cited by
Overweight, Obesity, and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Luppino, F. S., de Wit, L. M., Bouvy, P. F., Stijnen, T., Cuijpers, P., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Zitman, F. G. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 · Cited by 4,322
Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews
Hayden, J. A., Côté, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010 · Cited by 1,452
Depression and the risk for cardiovascular diseases: Systematic review and meta analysis
Van der Kooy, K., van Hout, H., Marwijk, H., Marten, H., Stehouwer, C., & Beekman, A. (2007) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1723 · Cited by 951
Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review
Mols, F., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Coebergh, J. W., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.017 · Cited by 585
Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.
(2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuijpers, T., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., & Bouter, L. M.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-431
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146096202
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.017
- The paper
- Kuijpers, T., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., & Bouter, L. M. (2004). Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
