The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice
Open accessAbstract
This is the fourth in a series of eight articles analysing the gap between research and practice Series editors: Andrew Haines and Anna Donald Clinicians and healthcare planners who want to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services will find help in research evidence. This evidence is increasingly accessible through information services that combine high quality evidence with information technology. However, there are several barriers to the successful application of research evidence to health care. We discuss both the prospects for harnessing evidence to improve health care and the problems that readers—clinicians, planners, and patients—will need to overcome to enjoy the benefits of research(box). View this table: Problems in implementing evidence based medicine and possible solutions The aim of evidence based health care is to provide the means by which current best evidence from research can be judiciously and conscientiously applied in the prevention, detection, and care of health disorders.1 This aim is decidedly ambitious given how slowly important new treatments are disseminated into practice2–%4and how resistant practitioners are to withdrawing established treatments from practice even once their utility has been disproved.5 ### Summary points The barriers to the dissemination and timely application of research findings in the making of decisions about health care are complex and have been little studied. They include many factors beyond the control of the practitioner …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Grilli, R., & Lomas, J. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199403000-00002 · Cited by 392
Karuza, J. (1995) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430060089011 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474
Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy
Lumley, J., Chamberlain, C., Dowswell, T., Oliver, S., Oakley, L., & Watson, L. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001055.pub3 · Cited by 890
The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment
Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., & Kogan, M. (2003) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/1478-4505-1-2 · Cited by 678
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy
Chamberlain, C., O'Mara-Eves, A., Porter, J., Coleman, T., Perlen, S. M., Thomas, J., & McKenzie, J. E. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001055.pub5 · Cited by 650
Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy
Lumley, J., Oliver, S., Chamberlain, C., & Oakley, L. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001055.pub2 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Haynes, B., & Haines, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-07-25
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7153
- Pages
- 273-276
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1853257794
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 57.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273
- The paper
- Haynes, B., & Haines, A. (1998). Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.