The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Objective To determine the safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care by investigating adverse events and the management of calls. Design Block randomised controlled trial over a year of 156 matched pairs of days and weekends in 26 blocks. One of each matched pair was randomised to receive the intervention. Setting One 55 member general practice cooperative serving 97 000 registered patients in Wiltshire. Subjects All patients contacting the out of hours service or about whom contact was made during specified times over the trial year. Intervention A nurse telephone consultation service integrated within a general practice cooperative. The out of hours period was 615 pm to 1115 pm from Monday to Friday, 1100 am to 1115 pm on Saturday, and 800 am to 1115 pm on Sunday. Experienced and specially trained nurses received, assessed, and managed calls from patients or their carers. Management options included telephone advice; referral to the general practitioner on duty (for telephone advice, an appointment at a primary care centre, or a home visit); referral to the emergency service or advice to attend accident and emergency. Calls were managed with the help of decision support software. Main outcome measures Deaths within seven days of a contact with the out of hours service; emergency hospital admissions within 24 hours and within three days of contact; attendance at accident and emergency within three days of a contact; number and management of calls in each arm of the trial. Results 14 492 calls were received during the specified times in the trial year (7308 in the control arm and 7184 in the intervention arm) concerning 10 134 patients (10.4% of the registered population). There were no substantial differences in the age and sex of patients in the intervention and control groups, though male patients were underrepresented overall. Reasons for calling the service were consistent with previous studies. Nurses managed 49.8% of calls during intervention periods without referral to a general practitioner. A 69% reduction in telephone advice from a general practitioner, together with a 38% reduction in patient attendance at primary care centres and a 23% reduction in home visits was observed during intervention periods. Statistical equivalence was observed in the number of deaths within seven days, in the number of emergency hospital admissions, and in the number of attendances at accident and emergency departments. Conclusions Nurse telephone consultation produced substantial changes in call management, reducing overall workload of general practitioners by 50% while allowing callers faster access to health information and advice. It was not associated with an increase in the number of adverse events. This model of out of hours primary care is safe and effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N. M., Hebert, L., Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C., & Hiatt, H. H. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199102073240604 · Cited by 4,627
Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach.
Hill, I. D., & Pocock, S. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531186 · Cited by 2,930
Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines.
Jolliffe, F. R., Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1990) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982808 · Cited by 1,319
Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods: Fig 1
Jones, B., Jarvis, P., Lewis, J. A., & Ebbutt, A. F. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36 · Cited by 1,032
Brennan, T. A. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2002.003822 · Cited by 942
Plamping, D. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6779.737 · Cited by 331
Statistics with confidence - confidence intervals and statistical guidelines
Wingate, D. (1989) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.30.10.1439-a · Cited by 302
SPSS pour Windows. Manuel d'utilisation, système de base, version 6.0
Norusis, M. J., & Desbois, D. (1994) · HAL · Cited by 290
Decision-making Strategies for Telephone Triage in Emergency Medical Services
Leprohon, J., & Patel, V. L. (1995) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9501500307 · Cited by 147
Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work
Hallam, L. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6923.249 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care
Laurant, M., van der Biezen, M., Wijers, N., Watananirun, K., Kontopantelis, E., & van Vught, A. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001271.pub3 · Cited by 614
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study
Semigran, H. L., Linder, J. A., Gidengil, C., & Mehrotra, A. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h3480 · Cited by 489
Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction
Bunn, F., Byrne, G., & Kendall, S. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004180.pub2 · Cited by 241
Campbell, J. L., Fletcher, E., Britten, N., Green, C., Holt, T. A., Lattimer, V., Richards, D. A., Richards, S. H., Salisbury, C., Calitri, R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61058-8 · Cited by 236
Self-citationBonsall, K., & Cheater, F. M. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.013 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Lattimer, V., George, S., Thompson, F., Thomas, E., Mullee, M., Turnbull, J., Smith, H., Moore, M., Bond, H., & Glasper, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-10-17
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7165
- Pages
- 1054-1059
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2120761522
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054
- The paper
- Lattimer, V., George, S., Thompson, F., Thomas, E., Mullee, M., Turnbull, J., Smith, H., Moore, M., Bond, H., & Glasper, A. (1998). Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.