Cited by 145Nursing Roles and PracticesNursing education and managementNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership

What is the impact of advanced primary care nursing roles on patients, nurses and their colleagues? A literature review

Bonsall, Kate, Cheater, Francine M.·2008·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objectives To review and draw together the existing research evidence to assess the impact of advanced primary care nursing roles, particularly first contact nursing roles, for patients, nurses themselves and their colleagues in order to highlight salient issues for policy, practice and research.Background Internationally, nurses' roles continue to expand in response to doctor shortages and policy drives to provide effective and efficient health services. A body of research exists from which to evaluate the impact of advanced nursing roles on various dimensions of healthcare delivery and organisation.Design and data sources Medline, CINAHL, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, British Nursing Index, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, National Research Register, and PsycINFO databases were searched, including relevant websites. Studies were included if published in English and relevant to the primary/community care setting. Of a total of 211 papers identified, 88 were of relevance and included in the review.Results Nurses working in many advanced primary care roles such as acute/minor illness, minor injury and long-term conditions provide safe and effective care, and patient satisfaction is generally high. Many factors influence patient satisfaction with, and access to, such services but are little understood. Evidence on cost-effectiveness, efficiency and impact on other health care professionals is inconclusive though research suggests the introduction of extended roles can create uncertainty and intra-/inter-professional tensions.Conclusions Evidence is of variable quality, often ignoring potentially important effect mediators such as the experience and educational level of advanced nurses, the effect of service 'maturation', organisational characteristics and differing patient preferences. The complex range of factors that influence patient satisfaction, access and outcomes of care need further investigation. Recent UK developments in nurse prescribing and the introduction of a national post-registration competency framework may improve working relations and patient understanding and experience of advanced nursing roles in primary care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.013

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies with strong research designs have shown nursing-intensive primary care models to be safe and effective.

    “Many studies with strong research designs have shown nursing-intensive primary care models to be safe and effective.8,11,18-26”
  • Measurable clinical outcomes are systematically found to be equivalent to those produced by medical models, though patient satisfaction tends to be higher for nurse-provided services.

    “Measurable clinical outcomes are systematically found to be equivalent11,18,19,23,27-32 to those produced by medical models, though patient satisfaction tends to be higher for nurse-provided services.11,19,21,26,27,29,30,33,34”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonsall, K., & Cheater, F. M.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Bonsall, Kate
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1090-1102
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996153035
Cited by
145
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Keywords
patient satisfaction, health care access, interprofessional relations, cost-effectiveness, nurse prescribing, chronic disease, community-based care
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Nursing, Patients, Primary Health Care, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review