Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 888

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study

Open access
Badawi, Nadia, Kurinczuk, Jennifer J, Keogh, John M, Alessandri, Louisa M, O'Sullivan, Fiona, Burton, Paul R, Pemberton, Patrick J, Stanley, Fiona J·1998·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain antepartum predictors of newborn encephalopathy in term infants. Design: Population based, unmatched case-control study. Setting: Metropolitan area of Western Australia, June 1993 to September 1995. Subjects: All 164 term infants with moderate or severe newborn encephalopathy; 400 randomly selected controls. Main outcome measures: Adjusted odds ratio estimates. Results: The birth prevalence of moderate or severe newborn encephalopathy was 3.8/1000 term live births. The neonatal fatality was 9.1%. The risk of newborn encephalopathy increased with increasing maternal age and decreased with increasing parity. There was an increased risk associated with having a mother who was unemployed (odds ratio 3.60), an unskilled manual worker (3.84), or a housewife (2.48). Other risk factors from before conception were not having private health insurance (3.46), a family history of seizures (2.55), a family history of neurological disease (2.73), and infertility treatment (4.43). Risk factors during pregnancy were maternal thyroid disease (9.7), severe pre-eclampsia (6.30), moderate or severe bleeding (3.57), a clinically diagnosed viral illness (2.97), not having drunk alcohol (2.91); and placenta described at delivery as abnormal (2.07). Factors related to the baby were birth weight adjusted for gestational age between the third and ninth centile (4.37) or below the third centile (38.23). The risk relation with gestational age was J shaped with 38 and 39 weeks having the lowest risk. Conclusions: The causes of newborn encephalopathy are heterogeneous and many of the causal pathways start before birth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1549

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 888

Metadata

Authors
Badawi, N., Kurinczuk, J. J., Keogh, J. M., Alessandri, L. M., O'Sullivan, F., Burton, P. R., Pemberton, P. J., & Stanley, F. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-12-05
Volume
317
Issue
7172
Pages
1549-1553
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2104098750
Cited by
888
References
1
FWCI
19.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1549
The paper
Badawi, N., Kurinczuk, J. J., Keogh, J. M., Alessandri, L. M., O'Sullivan, F., Burton, P. R., Pemberton, P. J., & Stanley, F. J. (1998). Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1549

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.