The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain hospital inpatient mortality in England and to determine which factors best explain variation in standardised hospital death ratios. DESIGN: Weighted linear regression analysis of routinely collected data over four years, with hospital standardised mortality ratios as the dependent variable. SETTING: England. SUBJECTS: Eight million discharges from NHS hospitals when the primary diagnosis was one of the diagnoses accounting for 80% of inpatient deaths. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital standardised mortality ratios and predictors of variations in these ratios. RESULTS: The four year crude death rates varied across hospitals from 3.4% to 13.6% (average for England 8.5%), and standardised hospital mortality ratios ranged from 53 to 137 (average for England 100). The percentage of cases that were emergency admissions (60% of total hospital admissions) was the best predictor of this variation in mortality, with the ratio of hospital doctors to beds and general practitioners to head of population the next best predictors. When analyses were restricted to emergency admissions (which covered 93% of all patient deaths analysed) number of doctors per bed was the best predictor. CONCLUSION: Analysis of hospital episode statistics reveals wide variation in standardised hospital mortality ratios in England. The percentage of total admissions classified as emergencies is the most powerful predictor of variation in mortality. The ratios of doctors to head of population served, both in hospital and in general practice, seem to be critical determinants of standardised hospital death rates; the higher these ratios, the lower the death rates in both cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric Modelling
Royston, P., & Altman, D. G. (1994) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2986270 · Cited by 1,798
Deprivation and Health in Scotland
Tunstall-Pedoe, H. (1993) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.69.814.665-a · Cited by 1,167
League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance
Goldstein, H., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983325 · Cited by 1,069
Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine
Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., & Stanhope, N. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1154 · Cited by 906
Hospital Characteristics and Mortality Rates
Hartz, A. J., Krakauer, H., Kuhn, E. M., Young, M., Jacobsen, S. J., Gay, G., Muenz, L., Katzoff, M., Bailey, R. C., & Rimm, A. A. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198912213212506 · Cited by 513
Deprivation and health in Scotland
Watt, G. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90326-l · Cited by 473
Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.
Jarman, B. (1984) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1587 · Cited by 422
Self-citationlezzoni, L. I. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550190064046 · Cited by 408
Iezzoni, L. I. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.278.19.1600 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Cited by
Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health
STARFIELD, B., SHI, L., & MACINKO, J. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x · Cited by 5,507
Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?
Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b375 · Cited by 1,337
Escobar, G. J., Greene, J. D., Scheirer, P., Gardner, M. N., Draper, D., & Kipnis, P. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181589bb6 · Cited by 316
Griffiths, P., Ball, J., Drennan, J., Dall’Ora, C., Jones, J., Maruotti, A., Pope, C., Recio Saucedo, A., & Simon, M. (2016) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.012 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarman, B., Gault, S., Alves, B., Hider, A., Dolan, S., Cook, A., Hurwitz, B., & Iezzoni, L. I.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-06-05
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7197
- Pages
- 1515-1520
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2097960474
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 27.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1515
- The paper
- Jarman, B., Gault, S., Alves, B., Hider, A., Dolan, S., Cook, A., Hurwitz, B., & Iezzoni, L. I. (1999). Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.