Cited by 1,337Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?

Moons, K. G M, Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E, Altman, D. G·2009·BMJ

Abstract

Doctors have little specific research to draw on when predicting outcome. In this first article in a series Karel Moons and colleagues explain why research into prognosis is important and how to design such research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.b375

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge of the predictors might influence outcome assessment, resulting in a biased estimation of the predictor effects for the outcome.

    “Knowledge of the predictors might influence outcome assessment, resulting in a biased estimation of the predictor effects for the outcome [6],[17],[39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Moons, K. G M
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-02-23
Volume
338
Issue
feb23 1
Pages
b375-b375
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1994224528
Cited by
1,337
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 59
FWCI
44.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Medical Research Council (MC_EX_G0800814)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
prognosis, prognostic research, outcome prediction, research design, prognostic factors, clinical prediction
MeSH terms
Prognosis, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Causality, Multivariate Analysis, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review