Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports

Open access
Williamson, L M, Lowe, S, Love, E M, Cohen, H, Soldan, K, McClelland, D B L, Skacel, P, Barbara, J A J·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To receive and collate reports of death or major complications of transfusion of blood or components. Design: Haematologists were invited confidentially to report deaths and major complications after blood transfusion during October 1996 to September 1998. Setting: Hospitals in United Kingdom and Ireland. Subjects: Patients who died or experienced serious complications, as defined below, associated with transfusion of red cells, platelets, fresh frozen plasma, or cryoprecipitate. Main outcome measures: Death, “wrong” blood transfused to patient, acute and delayed transfusion reactions, transfusion related acute lung injury, transfusion associated graft versus host disease, post-transfusion purpura, and infection transmitted by transfusion. Circumstances relating to these cases and relative frequency of complications. Results: Over 24 months, 366 cases were reported, of which 191 (52%) were “wrong blood to patient” episodes. Analysis of these revealed multiple errors of identification, often beginning when blood was collected from the blood bank. There were 22 deaths from all causes, including three from ABO incompatibility. There were 12 infections: four bacterial (one fatal), seven viral, and one fatal case of malaria. During the second 12 months, 164/424 hospitals (39%) submitted a “nil to report” return. Conclusions: Transfusion is now extremely safe, but vigilance is needed to ensure correct identification of blood and patient. Staff education should include awareness of ABO incompatibility and bacterial contamination as causes of life threatening reactions to blood. Key messages Blood transfusion, while extremely safe, has several potentially fatal hazards All staff handling blood should be aware of the importance of correct identity of sample, patient, and blood bag at all stages Resources should be directed to evaluation of methods for improving identification of patients Acute fever or collapse during or after transfusion may be due to ABO incompatibility or bacterial contamination Microbiological complications of transfusion accounted for a minor component of all reports

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.16

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Williamson, L. M., Lowe, S., Love, E. M., Cohen, H., Soldan, K., McClelland, D. B. L., Skacel, P., & Barbara, J. A. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-07-03
Volume
319
Issue
7201
Pages
16-19
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2023305393
Cited by
335
References
0
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.319.7201.16
The paper
Williamson, L. M., Lowe, S., Love, E. M., Cohen, H., Soldan, K., McClelland, D. B. L., Skacel, P., & Barbara, J. A. J. (1999). Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7201.16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.